A LATER (2021) SUMMARY OF THIS BOOK IS THE FOLLOWING PDF ARTICLE
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pKBVxQLiJwqzMGcvPM00L6rbp_v9aLuD/view?usp=sharing
THE CURRENT BLOG (ONLINE BOOK) HAS MAINLY SPECULATIVE CHARACTER AND IS INTRODUCING ONLY VERY PARTIALLY NEW QUANTITATIVE FORMULAE OF PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. IT IS MAINLY A CHANGE OF PERCEPTION OF THE PHYSICAL REALITY AS WE KNOW IT, TO ONE THAT HAS ALSO A 2ND MICROSCOPIC LAYER BASED ON THE ANALOGUE OF THE TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES OF PROTON ELECTRON AND NEUTRON BUT ON A SMALLER SCALE AS MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES OF MICRO-PROTON MICRO-ELECTRON AND MICRO-NEUTRON (BUT ALSO MACROSCOPIC LAYER) , THAT CURRENTLY WE KNOW PARTIALLY AS FIELDS LIKE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD OR QUANTUM VACUUM. WE LEAVE OPEN THE MANY DIFFERENT WAYS THAT THE MATTER OF PROTONS/NEUTRONS/ELECTRONS CAN COUPLE WITH THE 2ND LAYER MATTER OF MICRO-PROTINS/MICRO-NEUTRONS/MICRO-ELECTRONS IN OTHER WORDS THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND THE "QUANTUM VACUUM".
THE ONLY NEW SPECULATION OF QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION IS THE APPLICATION OF THE WELL KNOWN NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS FOR THIS 2ND MICROSCOPIC FLUID LAYER IN THE ABSENCE OF COUPLING WITH THE VISIBLE MATTER (OF ELECTRONS PROTONS NEUTRONS OR PLANETS ). THEREFORE A QUANTITATIVE FORMULATION WHICH IS OF APPLICATIONS TO A RATHER MACROSCOPIC SCALE E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE.
THIS WORK DOES THE BEST ONE CAN DO TO DISCOVER THE TRUTH BEHIND THE STANDARD EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM AS FAR AS A 2ND MATERIAL LAYER UNIFICATION IS INTENDED, WHEN NO LABORATORIES EXPERIMENTS AND LARGE GROUPS OF SCIENTISTS WITH WELL FUNDED RESEARCH IS POSSIBLE. THE MAIN 3 CONTRIBUTIONS ARE
1) THE REVEALING OF THE TRUE MEANING OF THE POISSON EQUATION OF NEWTON'S SPHERICAL GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL IN RELATION TO THE POISSON EQUATION OF SPHERICAL HEAT PROPAGATION IS THE KEY SHIFT IN THE CORRECT PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF GRAVITATION WHICH ALLOWS FOR DISCOVERING SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY STORED IN IT.
2) THE REVEALING INTERPRETATION OF MAXWELL'S ELECTROMAGNETIC MAGITUTES IN RELATION TO AN IONIZED OR CHANGED 2ND MATERIAL LAYER SUBSTRATUM AND
3) THE PRELIMINARY UNIFYING ROLE OF NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS OF THE SUBSTRATUM MATERIAL FLUID FOR GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF NEW ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION FOR TRANSPORTATIONS.
IT IS ALSO SPECULATED HOW BY CHANGING THE PERCEPTION OF MATERIAL REALITY FROM A SINGLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCY) OF THE STANDARD ABOVE FREE AND PERMANENT TRIAD OF PARTICLES TO AT LEAST A DOUBLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCIES) PHYSICAL REALITY WITH BOTH THE STANDARD TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES BUT ALSO MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES WE COULD DO THE NEXT:
A) REFORMULATE EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION WHICH INCLUDE THOSE OF I. NEWTON AND ARE MORE EXACT AND PHYSICALLY MEANINGFUL AND REALISTIC THAN THOSE OF A. EINSTEIN.
B) REFORMULATE AND PROVE AGAIN THE SPECIAL RELATIVITY FORMULAE AS A KIND OF "LINEARIZED WAVED INERTIA" OF E.G. AN ELECTRON ON THE SUBSTRATUM 2ND LAYER PHYSICAL REALITY, BUT UNDER TOTALLY DIFFERENT AXIOMS THAT DO NOT INVOLVE THAT NOTHING GOES FASTER THAN LIGHT.
C) REFORMULATE NON-LINEAR EQUATIONS FOR THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM WHICH INVOLVE THOUGH MAGNITUDES OF GRAVITATION TOO, FOR LARGE SCALE PHENOMENA E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE PHENOMENA . THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IS ONLY THE LINEAR COUPLING OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD WHICH IS MADE FROM THE MICRO-TRIAD OF MICRO-PROTONS MICRO-NEUTRONS AND MICRO-ELECTRONS, WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS AND IS ACCEPTABLE APPROXIMATELY CORRECT AT SMALL LABORATORY SCALE.
D) AFTER THE JOIN REFORMULATION OF CLASSICAL GRAVITATION AND CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IN THE NEXT DECADES PREDICT THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES THAT MAY EXTRACT RENEWABLE SOLAR ENERGY STORED IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD (FREE ENERGY). AND THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION FLYING VEHICLES IN VARIOUS SHAPES, INCLUDING DISC-SHAPES, THAT MAY USE THE ABOVE ENERGY FOR FLYING .
E) DERIVE THE SCHRODINGER WAVE MECHANICS OR THE EQUIVALENT HEISENBERG MATRIX MECHANICS FROM A LINEAR COUPLING OF THE SUBSTRATUM LAYER NEUTRAL FLUID OF MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES (CALLED ERRONEOUSLY QUANTUM VACUUM) OR GRAVITATIONAL FIELD WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS.
IN SUMMARY MORE THAN 80% THE CONTENT OF THE CURRENT WORKS IS TO CHANGE DEEPLY AND IN A PROFOUND WAY OUR QUALITATIVE PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE PHYSICAL REALITY WHICH CAN LEAD IN THE FUTURE DECADES TO A MORE DETAILED UNIFIED QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM. IN LESS THAN 20% OF THE SPECULATIONS, THE ONLY QUANTITATIVE SET OF FORMULAE (THOSE OF NAVIER-STOKES) THAT ARE INTRODUCED ARE ONLY A PRELIMINARY STEP THAT CAN BE DONE IN RATHER EASIER WAY FOR THIS UNIFICATION, AND HAS APPLICATIONS MAINLY TO LARGER SCALE PHENOMENA E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM.
A LATER (2021) SUMMARY OF THIS BOOK IS THE FOLLOWING PDF ARTICLE
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nWVE13eDKBcuYS9zBM_MwoNJ6s-6i6v9/view?usp=sharing
WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY CONCEPTUAL CHANGES IN PHYSICS FOR
DISCOVERING THE ENERGY OF THE
FUTURE.
By Dr
Constantine Kyritsis
Associate professor in quantitative methods
University of Ioannina
Arta
September 2013
Abstract
In this paper we outline
the necessary conceptual changes, in fundamental university physics, so as to
support the emerging invention of the energy of the future. We give also a
short historic and epistemological review of the development of physics the
last few centuries.
1.
Introduction
The
goal of the paper is to outline the successful perception of
physical reality which will allow for a future, global, clean , safe and cheap
energy. It is not the goal to introduce new quantitative equations or attempt a
full and quantitative complete explanation of existing innovative inventions
(of “free energy”).It is more conceptual and epistemological, which is useful
also to find our way among a great number of relevant inventions.
2. What is the energy of the future?
We define as energy of the future, energy which
is
1. Clean (from CO2
emissions)
2. Fully Safe and
not explosive or destructive.
3. Of not very
expensive and complicated technology (smart).
4. Renewable
5. Able to support
continuously increasing or unexpected demand of power.
What is the
current situation with the so called “free energy”? Here are the facts: This
“free-energy” seems renewable, it is cheaper than oil, and it is clean. There is an increasing number of genuine
inventors from the 20 to the 21st century. There is almost absolute inability
of the University Physics to account for these inventions (“they should not
release extra energy according to the university physics” they say) There are many interpolation
of fake inventions or frauds. There is failure sooner or later to create high
profile, large scale commercialized products of it. Some inventors or relevant
business become the victim of neo-nazi terrorism.
2.
The
non-explaning explanations
Some
attempted explanations of the “free-energy” devices are based on the “energy of
the quantum vacuum”. It is known in elementary particle physics, that the
energy is only in the average conserved. But here in the average it is not
conserved, if accounted with the conventional physical reality concepts.
And even if
it was conserved in the average, an explanation that this energy comes from the
absolute quantum vacuum, that is from zero and nothingness , it is obviously a no-explanation.
What is not
to trust in attempted explanations?
The previous
“quantum vacuum” energy approaches and some other attempts with obscure
twisting of existing concepts, have one common property: The try to explain the measured extra energy, in "free energy" devices without changing almost nothing in the rest of the conceptual system ,
equations and theories of physics. I
believe that this is an indication that the explanation is neither too much
correct, neither comprehensive enough to account for almost all such devices. It is an indication that the explanation
should not be trusted, in the sense that it is not the one that will eventually change the face fundamental theoretical of physics.
3.
The
glorious story of “the atoms” in the science of physics
For at least
half a century, chemists were writing H20 and H2SO4 etc but they did not accept
the existence of …atoms. The theory of “phases” of matter (an extension of the
3 phases of solid, liquid and gaseous) was the theoretical University Status
Quo. Much like the current theories of empty space-time and quantum vacuum.
Boltzmann
had developed his statistical atomic theory of the gasses, but it was not an
accepted theory. The existence of atoms
was accepted after a small paper by A. Einstein in 1905, which explained the
Brownian motion, by the existence of atoms. With that he took the Nobel prize! And
the Brownian motion was an experiment known since 1820…So it is not the
experimental facts that were missing but the correct attitude and perception
about the physical reality.
Here
we have obviously a phenomenon of “delay” in the evolution of physics.
What we
observe with the story of the atomic theories, till the final acceptance of the
existence of atoms, is that there was a delay of at least 50 years.
In this we do not include gifted individuals
like I. Newton who in his private letters to his friends, he was claiming that
he was absolutely sure that matter consists from atoms, already some centuries
before 1905. Or the atomic theories of the ancient Greek philosophers Lefkipos
and Democritous.
I think
history is repeating with the “free-energy” devices, and I think that the main
cause of such “delays” in the development in the science of physics are due to
the complications of negative will towards evolution of the civilization.
4.
The 20th
century approach about physical reality.
The 20th
century concept of physical reality was (and in some extent still is) based on:
1) There is
no finer physical reality of free, permanent particles smaller than the proton,
neutron, electron. (the majority of quantum particles are not permanent and
quarks are not free). Thus anything beyond the known is a quantum-vacuum.
(Already a logical error: what you cannot trace as particles experimentally is
not a proof that they do not exist as material reality, given that you can trace it as a field with inertia and
momentum).
This also leads to the duality of the physical material reality to 1) Atomic matter 2) Mateial Fields (Like electromagnetic, gravitational, etc) The correct approach should be to perceive the physical material reality as only from atomic matter but with atoms of different orders. In other words perceive and descrive the fields as material fluids also of finer atomic structure.
2) Light is
a particle (photon) and not a wave of a finer material reality. Nothing goes
faster than photons
3) The
quartet of classical atomic physics photon, neutron, electron, proton gives
essentially all the known physical reality.
4) The
physical reality is “one sheet” not
“many-sheets” or layers or frequencies (the frequency here being the
average of the spin of protons, electrons, neutrons or more precisely the DeBroglie-Compton frequency).
Here we may
observe that the current, quantum particle physics is a dead-end
It is
looking in the wrong space-time scale (atomic particles) Either it should
concentrate on classical laboratory scale experiments (the smart approach) , or
to a radically smaller space-time reality of particles (10^36 times smaller,
the advanced approach) and the latter
the current earthly technology does not permit it.
It is using
very poor concepts, like wave-particle
duality, light as photon-particle, nothing goes faster than light, empty-space-time,
quantum vacuum etc.
The current
quantum particle physics was designed to improve the nuclear weapons. Not to
find new sources of clean, non-war-weapons ,energy. That is why it is also
scientifically a dead end, as it is also morally a dead-end.
Seemingly
success like the verification of Higgs mass-field in accelerators , or
“negative-sign-dark-energy” between remote galaxies, are indicative of the
inappropriateness of the available
concepts and may make an awakened physicist uncomfortable.
5.
A 2nd level
of atoms and layer of material reality: A new perception of the physical reality.
It seems that a very comprehensive perception of the physical reality, is that the tree of creation of matter, from 3 permanent free particles (proton, neutron, electron) is repeated at a finer space-time scale and frequency (By frequency of the matter here we do not mean
the Compton-De Broglie frequency of the electrons of the matter see but we may mean the
actual average frequency of the spin of electrons , protons and neutrons.) For example of
we utilize the data of the classical electron , the frequency fr of the spin of the electron is
fr=s*5/(2*m*R^2) where s is the spin s=+,- ½ ĥ , (ĥ=h/2π) , R is the radius, and m its mass.
While the Compton-de Broglie frequency fc is fc= (m*c^2)/h.
To make an estimate of the frequency of the visible matter reality we enter the data
ĥ=h/2π=6.58 *10^(-25) GeV *sec , electron mass me=0.10938356*10^(-31)kgr, and the
classical radius of the electron R=re=(1/4πε0)*(e^2)/me*c^2 , where c is the speed of light.
So that re=2.817940326727*10^(-13) cm, and s=5.264*10^(-44)joules*sec.
Putting these data in the formula of the frequency of the spin and making the calculations it
gives the result of about fr=1.81 Terra Hertz. As the range of the infrared is between 430
Terra Hz -300 Giga Hz, this frequency is in the range of the infrared. While the Compton-de
Broglie frequency is 1.97 Giga Hertz. An increase of the frequency of the visible matter
reality will have the result of decrease of the radius of electrons, protons and neutrons.
Now when we talk about the 2nd frequency material reality, we mean of course the material
reality made from the aetheron particles that the elctromagnetic and gravitational field are
made.
In other
words we repeat this creation at a space-time scale 10^36 time smaller (about
the comparison of a proton to the size of a star), and we substitute the
quantum vacuum with a finer material reality created by micro-protons,
micro-neutrons, and micro-electrons.
This is an
instance of a leveled concept of atomicity of matter, and can be repeated more
than twice that we suggest here.
As in the classical
1st story of the atoms it was the Brownian motion that was the proof that atoms
exist, similarly the well known Shroendinger motion of particles like electrons
etc, in the “vacuum” can be the proof of the existence of the 2nd
micro-resolution reality atoms created by micro-electrons, micro-neutrons and
micro-protons. Either we accept as proof or as it is well known we should have
to abandon the principle of sufficient physical causes (as Von Neumann had
remarked) for such random motions of electrons in the vacuum (where “nothing”
waves them)
The approach of the future is expected to be
the acceptance of :a 2nd frequency and micro-resolution material reality
So here is
the anticipated evolution in the science of physics: Not a new cumbersome field
of “empty-space-time” or quantum vacuum, that correct and unifies
electromagnetism and gravitation, but this unification through the fluid
dynamics of matter, of a finer material micro-resolution reality.
It is not a
better field theory in the vacuum that we need, but to realize that we are
dealing with a finer material reality, where the light is not a “particle” but
a wave in the finer material reality, a non-linear wave, that in high
frequencies it may behave as if a particle.
We do not
accept energy , momentum and inertia as properties of the empty space or vacuum, or of field (the field as non-matter) in vacuum , but any energy, momentum and
inertia are properties of matter and
not of vacuum or field in vacuum.
The 20th century physics is some how acquainted with the 2nd frequency material reality, as a partial knowledge of the
1) Electromagnetic field (or old electromagnetized aether of Maxwell)
2) The gravitational field of Einstein (or old Newtons aether as medium of light propagation)
3) The "Quantum vacuum" which is responsible for making the elementary particles to move and "dance" even each one of them separated from any other, and which made the Nobel prize winner Dirac to write that "we are forced to accept aether", as that which makes a particle move randomly according to Schroendingers wave equation (De Broglie-Schroendinger-Dirac aether).
1) the macroscopic linear classical maxwell equations of the electromagnetic field
It is often discussed the EPR objection of Einstein to quantum physics that it is not a complete physical theory. In our current research we deal with in the next way
A) The EPR objection of Einstein about the incompleteness of Quantum mechanics has an element of truth, in the sense that if we really beleive that the "quantum vacuum" is really a vacuum, then as v. Neumann remarked, we also abandon the principle of sufficient physical causes for the physical events. In other words we accept forces outside the physical reality that are responsible to the motions of the particles. And in the case of protons, electrons and neutrons, this realm of "outside the physical atomic material reality" may include the electromagnetic and gravitational field that classical physics was not considering as realm outside the physical reality"
B) Nevertheless both Maxwell's electromagnetism and Einsteins special and general relativity and gravitational field are also incomplete in a different sense: They separate the physical material reality to two types of materiality
1) The matter that consists from protons electrons and neutrons
2) The fields in the vacuum that although they have energy and momentum density and mass, are considered as "ghost matter" without and constitution from any type of particles.
Both of these incompleteness cases are resolved by realizing that all the above fields and "quantum vacuum" are in fact instances of the 2nd frequency physical material reality, which also has atomic structure.
Any more detailed and mathematical descriptions of say the basic gaseous form of the 2nd frequency material reality (or in old 19th century terminology "aether") should be able to describe the concept of
gaseous fluid from 3 types of permanent and free particles (like
micro-electron, micro-proton, micro-neutron) we should be able to derive as
special type approximations under simplifying assumptions
1) the macroscopic linear classical maxwell equations of the electromagnetic field
2) the
macroscopic Einsteins and newtons equations of the gravitational field, and Einsteins equations of special relativity
3) the
microscopic Schroendingers equations of motion of particles
The use of the term "aether" that would be
sound and valid would be is as a summary of the well established physical
theories of
1) electromagnetic field
2) special relativity and
gravitational field
3) quantum "vacuum" substratum in the
schroendinger wave equation.
The intended unification and derivation
of the above fields, is when we conceive "aether" as the plasma state
of the 2nd frequency material reality (not the plasma of the 1st frequency
material reality).
Table 1: Material reality of at least 2 layers-frequencies.
1st frequency material reality
(the average frequency of the
spin)
|
Creating free-permanent
triad
(proton, neutron, electron) and of course for anti-matter
anti-triad
|
Periodic System
Yes. Known
|
Common wave
Sound
|
Common materiality
Solid objects, liquids, gases
|
Organic living configurations:
Yes Known Biology
|
2nd frequency
material reality
(the average frequency of
the spin)
|
Creating free-permanent triad of aetherons (maybe 10^36 times
smaller that those of 1st frequency)
(micro-proton, micro-neutron,
micro-electron) and of course for anti-matter anti-triad
|
Periodic System
Yes. Unknown
|
Common wave
Light
|
Common materiality.
Electromagnetic ,
Gravitational fields
|
Organic living configurations:
Yes Unknown e.g. Human
aetheric body.
|
Let us try
now to discuss from where comes the so called “free energy”
The devices
or inventions of the so called “free-energy” are so numerous and of increasing
number, that it would be a surprise that almost all of them would have the same
explanation in all the details.
Therefore
any general qualitative not fully quantitative perspective of the source of
their energy, should follow very broad and general concepts.
So the suggested here general perspective is
that, since there is not really quantum vacuum, or empty-space time, the source
of this energy should be the various forms of energy of the 2nd frequency and
resolution micro-physical reality, like e.g. heat, which is the at least one next step of physical
reality after that of protons, neutrons and electrons. In other words energy
much relevant to the energy content of this that we call “fields” like
gravitation and electromagnetism. And the reason of course that we cannot
account so far for this energy is that we do not perceive the fields as a 2nd
micro-resolution physical reality.Now it may turn out that this heat of the 2nd
micro-resolution material reality (or classical fields) may be supported by the
infrared solar radiation. That would not be strange at all, and it would turn
the so called “free-energy” to indirect solar
energy stored in the 2nd micro-resolution reality (and also potential of the
new universal attraction).
6.
The current
feasible attitude of the University Research
Repeat
experiments of “free-energy” devices in University laboratories and validate
the extraction of energy.No error, no deception. Do not yet attempt a full
explanation to account for the appearing extra energy.
E.g. Tadahiko
Mizuno (Hokkaido University) of excess
heat at high voltage-electrolysis of water, published at the Japanese Journal of applied physics (see e.g.
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoThydrogenev.pdf)
Some beliefs
of modern physics that may turn out to be wrong.
1)
The inertial mass of bodies ( of constant amount of molecular matter) at low speed (non-relativistic) cannot be decreased below the inertia of the rest mass.
2)
All matter starts with protons, neutrons, electrons. In other words, there are
not smaller free permanent particles (Quantum
particles are excluded as they are not permanent or free)
3)
Nothing goes faster than photons
4)
All macroscopic electromagnetic interactions are described with the linear
equations of Maxwell.
5)
All forces acting on laboratory macroscopic objects at low speed
(non-relativistic) are of the next 5 types a) Inertial, b) by contact with
other material bodies made from protons, neutrons, electrons, c) Newtonian
gravitation forces d) Maxwell's electromagnetic forces e) no other type of
forces.
What is more
likely the case
1)
It is possible under special conditions to have radical decrease of the inertia
of the rest mass of a body in slow motion
2)
Aether is a 2nd material reality made from permanent particles of positive
negative and neutral charge, transcendentally finer than
protons-neutrons-electrons and the electromagnetic and gravitational field is
aspects of the functions of aether.
3)
To say than nothing goes faster than light in aether, is like saying than no
airplane can go faster than the sound, in air.
4)
The linear Maxwell equations of electromagnetism are correct only for a limited
realm of experiments those discovered at the end of the 19th century, not all
laboratory scale experiments that we now know. They need revision, and their
correct version include parameters of gravitation too, and are non-linear.
5)
Besides, inertial forces, classical electromagnetic forces and Newtonian and
Einsteinian gravitational forces, and forces by contact of bodies, exist also a 5th type of macroscopic
laboratory scale forces on bodies from the rest of the gravitational field that
we do not know. (In underground physics, this unknown field is called
anti-gravity or the classical gravity is called aether-statics and this field,
aether-dynamic field of the neutral aether)
Here we state 3 conjectures and keys for the further advancement of the fundamental physics towards, discovering a future clean , and cheaper renewable energy.
To simplify terms lets call aether, the gaseous 2nd-frequency matter , in the previous table.
1) The 1st ket to start understanding the mechanism behind the inverse square law of Newton, in universal attraction or gravitation is the identification: The Newtonian gravitational scalar potential φ is proportional to the gaseous 2nd frequency matter temperature gasseous matter.
2) The 2nd key is : The scalar electromagnetic potential a0 is proportional to the pressure of the non-neutral aether (or non-neutral gaseous 2nd frequency material density)
3) The 3rd key is:The vector electromagnetic potential A is proportional to the vector of momentum of the non-neutral aether ( or non-neutral gaseous 2nd frequency material density).
7.
Epilogue
What is
needed is an awakened attitude from the Scientifics of physics in the
universities.
A systematic
reproduction of the “free energy” devices in University laboratories Altruism
and not private interests from the side of the inventors. Thorough critique of
the existing theories of the classical fields of laboratory scale
electromagnetism and Einstein’s gravitation.
References (indicative
only of the history of physics.)
[Aspden,H] a)Anti-gravity
electronics Electronic &Wireless WorldJanuary
1989 b)The theory of AntigravityPhysical Essays Volume 4,number 1 1991.http://www.aspden.org/` http://www.energyscience.co.uk/books.htmlhttp://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_4_8_1.html
[Bohm D.-Vigier
J.P.] “Model of the causal interpretation of
quantum theory in terms of a fluid with irregular fluctuations “Physical
Review 96pp 208-216 (1954)
[Dirac
P.A.M] Is
there an eather?Proc.Roy.Soc. A.209 ,291 ,(1951)
[Donald
Reed] (addedd 2012) Beltrami vector fields in Electrodynamics:
A reason for re-eamining The structural foundations
of
classical field physics?
Modern Nonlinear Optics, Part 3, Second Edition: Advances
in Chemical Physics, Volume 119.
Edited by Myron W. Evans. Series Editors: I. Prigogine and
Stuart A. Rice.
Copyright # 2001
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
ISBNs: 0-471-38932-3
(Hardback); 0-471-23149-5
[Hayasaka,H.Tackeuchi
S.] Phys.
Rev. Lett 63, 2701 (1989)
[
Itzycson ClaudeZuber Jean-Bernard] Quantum
Field Theory
[Kyritsis
Constantine 1998: The Lancaster Lecture. http://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.gr/2012/10/20-from-lancaster-lecture.html
http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.htm
