THE CURRENT BLOG (ONLINE BOOK) HAS MAINLY SPECULATIVE CHARACTER AND IS INTRODUCING ONLY VERY PARTIALLY NEW QUANTITATIVE FORMULAE OF PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. IT IS MAINLY A CHANGE OF PERCEPTION OF THE PHYSICAL REALITY AS WE KNOW IT, TO ONE THAT HAS ALSO A 2ND MICROSCOPIC LAYER BASED ON THE ANALOGUE OF THE TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES OF PROTON ELECTRON AND NEUTRON BUT ON A SMALLER SCALE AS MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES OF MICRO-PROTON MICRO-ELECTRON AND MICRO-NEUTRON (BUT ALSO MACROSCOPIC LAYER) , THAT CURRENTLY WE KNOW PARTIALLY AS FIELDS LIKE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD OR QUANTUM VACUUM. THE MAIN PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF MICRO-PROTON , MICRO-ELECTRON AND MICRO-NEUTRON IS THE FAMOUS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS, 2-SLIT ELECTRON EXPERIMENT WHERE IT IS PHOTOGRAPHED NOT ONLY THE ELECTRON THIS HITS THE PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATE BUT ALSO THE WAVE OF CHARGE BY SUCH MICRO-PARTICLES THAT THE ELECTRON MOTION CREATES. WE LEAVE OPEN THE MANY DIFFERENT WAYS THAT THE MATTER OF PROTONS/NEUTRONS/ELECTRONS CAN COUPLE WITH THE 2ND LAYER MATTER OF MICRO-PROTINS/MICRO-NEUTRONS/MICRO-ELECTRONS IN OTHER WORDS THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND THE "QUANTUM VACUUM".
THE ONLY NEW SPECULATION OF QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION IS THE APPLICATION OF THE WELL KNOWN NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS FOR THIS 2ND MICROSCOPIC FLUID LAYER IN THE ABSENCE OF COUPLING WITH THE VISIBLE MATTER (OF ELECTRONS PROTONS NEUTRONS OR PLANETS ). THEREFORE A QUANTITATIVE FORMULATION WHICH IS OF APPLICATIONS TO A RATHER MACROSCOPIC SCALE E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE.
THIS WORK DOES THE BEST ONE CAN DO TO DISCOVER THE TRUTH BEHIND THE STANDARD EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM AS FAR AS A 2ND MATERIAL LAYER UNIFICATION IS INTENDED, WHEN NO LABORATORIES EXPERIMENTS AND LARGE GROUPS OF SCIENTISTS WITH WELL FUNDED RESEARCH IS POSSIBLE. THE MAIN 3 CONTRIBUTIONS ARE
1) THE REVEALING OF THE TRUE MEANING OF THE POISSON EQUATION OF NEWTON'S SPHERICAL GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL IN RELATION TO THE POISSON EQUATION OF SPHERICAL HEAT PROPAGATION IS THE KEY SHIFT IN THE CORRECT PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF GRAVITATION WHICH ALLOWS FOR DISCOVERING SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY STORED IN IT.
2) THE REVEALING INTERPRETATION OF MAXWELL'S ELECTROMAGNETIC MAGITUTES IN RELATION TO AN IONIZED OR CHANGED 2ND MATERIAL LAYER SUBSTRATUM AND
3) THE PRELIMINARY UNIFYING ROLE OF NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS OF THE SUBSTRATUM MATERIAL FLUID FOR GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF NEW ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION FOR TRANSPORTATIONS.
IT IS ALSO SPECULATED HOW BY CHANGING THE PERCEPTION OF MATERIAL REALITY FROM A SINGLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCY) OF THE STANDARD ABOVE FREE AND PERMANENT TRIAD OF PARTICLES TO AT LEAST A DOUBLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCIES) PHYSICAL REALITY WITH BOTH THE STANDARD TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES BUT ALSO MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES WE COULD DO THE NEXT:
A) REFORMULATE EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION WHICH INCLUDE THOSE OF I. NEWTON AND ARE MORE EXACT AND PHYSICALLY MEANINGFUL AND REALISTIC THAN THOSE OF A. EINSTEIN.
B) REFORMULATE AND PROVE AGAIN THE SPECIAL RELATIVITY FORMULAE AS A KIND OF "LINEARIZED WAVED INERTIA" OF E.G. AN ELECTRON ON THE SUBSTRATUM 2ND LAYER PHYSICAL REALITY, BUT UNDER TOTALLY DIFFERENT AXIOMS THAT DO NOT INVOLVE THAT NOTHING GOES FASTER THAN LIGHT.
C) REFORMULATE NON-LINEAR EQUATIONS FOR THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM WHICH INVOLVE THOUGH MAGNITUDES OF GRAVITATION TOO, FOR LARGE SCALE PHENOMENA E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE PHENOMENA . THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IS ONLY THE LINEAR COUPLING OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD WHICH IS MADE FROM THE MICRO-TRIAD OF MICRO-PROTONS MICRO-NEUTRONS AND MICRO-ELECTRONS, WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS AND IS ACCEPTABLE APPROXIMATELY CORRECT AT SMALL LABORATORY SCALE.
D) AFTER THE JOIN REFORMULATION OF CLASSICAL GRAVITATION AND CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IN THE NEXT DECADES PREDICT THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES THAT MAY EXTRACT RENEWABLE SOLAR ENERGY STORED IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD (FREE ENERGY). AND THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION FLYING VEHICLES IN VARIOUS SHAPES, INCLUDING DISC-SHAPES, THAT MAY USE THE ABOVE ENERGY FOR FLYING .
E) DERIVE THE SCHRODINGER WAVE MECHANICS OR THE EQUIVALENT HEISENBERG MATRIX MECHANICS FROM A LINEAR COUPLING OF THE SUBSTRATUM LAYER NEUTRAL FLUID OF MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES (CALLED ERRONEOUSLY QUANTUM VACUUM) OR GRAVITATIONAL FIELD WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS.
IN SUMMARY MORE THAN 80% THE CONTENT OF THE CURRENT WORKS IS TO CHANGE DEEPLY AND IN A PROFOUND WAY OUR QUALITATIVE PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE PHYSICAL REALITY WHICH CAN LEAD IN THE FUTURE DECADES TO A MORE DETAILED UNIFIED QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM. IN LESS THAN 20% OF THE SPECULATIONS, THE ONLY QUANTITATIVE SET OF FORMULAE (THOSE OF NAVIER-STOKES) THAT ARE INTRODUCED ARE ONLY A PRELIMINARY STEP THAT CAN BE DONE IN RATHER EASIER WAY FOR THIS UNIFICATION, AND HAS APPLICATIONS MAINLY TO LARGER SCALE PHENOMENA E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM.
1) Is it required new mathematical concepts and methods for the present theory?
In this version I have not introduced new mathematical methods that do not already exist. But I believe that systems of much different time and space scale require a totally new differential calculus, that might be called multi-resolution differential calculus based on new digital mathematics that do not use limits and the infinite.
2) Why the present theory is not formulated in a relativistic way?
I am afraid we cannot answer this question without challenging somehow the common sense of widespread concepts in modern physics. The situation is like the tale of the emperor that went to a parade to show his new magnificent cloths ,but the truth is that the emperor was not wearing any cloths. It required the free mind of child to realize it.
So there are some contradictions in modern physics that even a high school student can understand but from the moment you became a PhD career physisits you would never mention them from the fear that you would be accused that you do not understand the advanced concepts. It is never realized how advanced concepts can become mind traps for the real understanding of physical reality. For me also these mind traps worked well till I was able to look again back to physics from the mindscape of social sciences and only when I became active in research in the social sciences so that a career in physics was not of interest anymore.
The attitude with which we try to re-found all of the physics in a relativistic formulation with the excuse that the changes of the system of reference for the physical description follow the Lorentz transformations is all wrong! I explained in the parapgraph 2 of this paper the reasons. The science of physics has long ago decided that in a situation that we discover distortion effects in the space and time measurement devices we do not make a theory that space or time is curved or distorted but that new factors that we did not account for so far enter the experiment and we try instead to make a theory of these factors within flat space and time. For example when in the history of physics was discovered that temperature influences the length measuring rods we did not make a theory that temperature curves space and time but rather that it simply influences the material devices that measure space and time. It is the same with special and general relativity ,what is curved is nothing but the propagation of light and this is far different from a curving of space or time.
In this paper we aim to free the mind from such mind-traps like “vacuum curved space-time or “quantum vacuum”. Therefore we could not possibly formulate a theory of the new experimental facts within a conceptual approach that tries to lock the mind about them.
Thus we definitely chose a classical conceptual approach which is natural, true in spite its approximatelimitations. It is obvious to us that any attempt to explain these macroscopic experiments as relativistic orquantum paradoxes, not only it does not put them inside academic science but instead would hade as a result to obscure them .
Evolution of science is not an easy matter. We understand of course that as well established science is full of professors with hundreds of publications in relativity (happily I have only one ), it is hard for them to accept any new true approach even if they witness themselves the experiments. It is their natural commitment to their papers and students that would make it almost impossible. Thus it is expected from new scientists with independent thinking and free access to the Internet that shall make this evolution..
To them are dedicated these papers.
I find that special and general relativity is in the history of science what is in the history of NASA the first lancing of the Humble telescope, that had a wrongly design mirror, which gave a distorted image of the world. It certainly takes a "Costar" project to correct it!
A believe that a relativistic formulation of such phenomena is not a serious approach and sooner or later shall lead to a deadlock.
3) Why the present theory is not formulated in Quantum Mechanical Formalism? Is there quantization of this field theory?
Or conversely, why it is derived Maxwell’s Electromagnetism and Newton’s Gravitation and not quantum electrodynamics also?
The answer is that we do not intent and we should not intent a microscopic description as for the intended applications, only a middle laboratory-scale and macroscopic planetary-scale is adequate and advantageous for humanity at the present situation. There is also the "Pareto rule" which says that at least 80% of the result is obtained with less than 20% of the effort. Less than the 20% of the rest of the result, requires more than the rest of 80% of the effort. Not to mention that a Quantum Formulation or resorting to physical micro scale would reverse the situation and would make such a research a disadvantage to the civilisation. We do not suggest and we do not support any deep particle structure theory of the gravitational field ,electromagnetic field etc. Only a statistical macroscopic classical field image of it. Neither the present physical heuristics should be used to change for the time being, any of the standard formulations in Quantum Mechanic. This seems to us better for many reasons: It is more practical, easier, safer, and relevant to the effects that are macroscopic. In fact the present suggested quantitative formulation does not and should not hold at the microscopic particle scale. Already at the middle-laboratory scale level is all the benefit that we miss and should first discover. It is an important gap of civilisation’s scientific intelligence and it is at the middle-laboratory scale not at the microscopic. Nuclear physics can be also considered an area with many accusations, and negative critique for the effects of science in society and planet’s life. Lets leave the new developments as innocent as possible and away from the direction of nuclear physics. Lets leave nuclear power to military people and only for a global defence of the planet to exterior threats. We must not forget that my decision to proceed with the present research and publish it, was motivated as a defence to real external to the planet threats to our civilisation and humanity which explains why it is a partial restoration of rationality in physics leaving outside the quantum mechanics.
As A. Einstein took the Nobel prize when he proved the existence of atoms by the almost one century old known experimental fact the Brownian motion that can be derived by the influence of atoms in matter , in the same way the wave mechanics or matrix mechanics formulation of Quantum physics is a way of random behavior of a proton or an electron or a neutron when the move and the proof of the existence of finer free and permanent atoms that make the electromagnetic and gravitational field (the same particles) or aether charged or neutral . This was highlighted by the nobel prize winner Dirac. Also von-Neumann mentioned that the absence of aether (of Dirac) is equivalent to the abandoning of the scientific principle of sufficient physical causes for observable phenomena like the motion of an electron. Instead of Brownian motion we have here the Shrowndiger or De Broglie motion. Of course to be able to derive mathematically that a proton or an electron or a neutron by their spin motion alone create waves in the aether which make them move randomly in the way that matrix mechanics describes or wave mechanics by a probability wave of motion of them is my far more difficult than the 5-6 pages paper of mathematical derivation of Brownian motion of A. Einstein. It requires non-linear random flow and Navier-stokes formulation of the aether, then linearization e.g. to a Dalambertian wave equation due to spin of e.g. an electron. Thus motion , momentum etc of the electron will correspond to an operator in a Hilbert space of aether material waves which is isomorphic with a corresponding Hilbert space of probability waves (Shroendiger waves) of the motion of electron and then back derivation of the Heisenberg matrix formulation of the motion of electron as von-Neumann had proved as equivalent formulation. Such a work though would makes us wake up about the 2nd frequency or 2nd resolution material reality (aether and liquid and solid versions of such matter also, that might make whole planet rather invisible ) which although we do know as electromagnetic waves or gravitational field we have not realized that we are talking about a whole new higher frequency physical reality with a new triad of free and permanent atoms the 1st micro electron , 1st micro-proton and 1st micro-neutron (to discriminate ot from 2nd 3rd aether etc).
As A. Einstein took the Nobel prize when he proved the existence of atoms by the almost one century old known experimental fact the Brownian motion that can be derived by the influence of atoms in matter , in the same way the wave mechanics or matrix mechanics formulation of Quantum physics is a way of random behavior of a proton or an electron or a neutron when the move and the proof of the existence of finer free and permanent atoms that make the electromagnetic and gravitational field (the same particles) or aether charged or neutral . This was highlighted by the nobel prize winner Dirac. Also von-Neumann mentioned that the absence of aether (of Dirac) is equivalent to the abandoning of the scientific principle of sufficient physical causes for observable phenomena like the motion of an electron. Instead of Brownian motion we have here the Shrowndiger or De Broglie motion. Of course to be able to derive mathematically that a proton or an electron or a neutron by their spin motion alone create waves in the aether which make them move randomly in the way that matrix mechanics describes or wave mechanics by a probability wave of motion of them is my far more difficult than the 5-6 pages paper of mathematical derivation of Brownian motion of A. Einstein. It requires non-linear random flow and Navier-stokes formulation of the aether, then linearization e.g. to a Dalambertian wave equation due to spin of e.g. an electron. Thus motion , momentum etc of the electron will correspond to an operator in a Hilbert space of aether material waves which is isomorphic with a corresponding Hilbert space of probability waves (Shroendiger waves) of the motion of electron and then back derivation of the Heisenberg matrix formulation of the motion of electron as von-Neumann had proved as equivalent formulation. Such a work though would makes us wake up about the 2nd frequency or 2nd resolution material reality (aether and liquid and solid versions of such matter also, that might make whole planet rather invisible ) which although we do know as electromagnetic waves or gravitational field we have not realized that we are talking about a whole new higher frequency physical reality with a new triad of free and permanent atoms the 1st micro electron , 1st micro-proton and 1st micro-neutron (to discriminate ot from 2nd 3rd aether etc).
4) Why it is restored the concepts of material field (aether) and is rejected the usual conception of vacuum?
I think the answer is obvious after the answer in questions 1,2.It is not possible to reinstall rationalism in physical theories before a quality in the overall civilization is also installed. Because I think it is from these external directions that we lost rationality in physics. Thus I am not in a position or probably entitled to really reinstall, and probably it might be that I should not do so, for the time being, and in its full sense, the aether . I shall mention nevertheless that Dirac as late as in 1956 in his paper [Dirac] with title “Is there an aether?” Concluded that “..we are forced therefore to accept the existence of aether ….”. It is I think not a matter of aether or anything else you may call it. It is rather a matter of integrated thinking , integrated rationalism, and the need for new faster transportation technologies inside and outside the planet and forms of energy that are safer than nuclear energy, plus to save our rational mind when encountering this that maybe beyond in physical advancement. If the societies on the other hand decide that we should not discover aether yet, then we might remain for one more century with the dogma of “vacuum space-time” and “quantum vacuum” trying to solve meanwhile administrative and social problems. In that case the present research could be formulated and conceived, only as new mathematical field equations for gravitation and electromagnetism, with new potentials, closer to known experiments and in an "empty space". It is a scenario that I am not sure that developments won’t go like that. The decision to proceed with the hydrogen energy model in the long run contains the decision to deal in the present right terms with the classical fields (aether) otherwise the effort would be much and the resulting benefits much less. Nevertheless for my personal world of thoughts I would adopt the freedom to think in a free and true way, which would not accept concepts like “vacuum space-time” or “quantum vacuum”. This attitude goes together I think with the right and positive orientation of the social moral and spirit. I am not sure that in the short term this mental attitude and choice would not bring bad luck because at least of widespread misconceptions in a hostile society. Probably it might in many cases. But we must not forget that my decision to proceed with the present research and publish it, was motivated as a defence to real external to the planet threats to our civilisation and humanity.
5) Is there a non-deterministic formulation of the theory?
Of course there is but as usually we start with the deterministic formulation. The deterministic formulation is the appropriate for the macroscopic scale. So for the intended control of the interactions is superior to other formulations. Of course for macroscopic control there is stochastic formulation but this is not of the nature of quantum mechanics (because the cause of the fluctuations is not a substratum realm) but as is the formulations in random fluids mechanics, in other words due to random effects of the boundary conditions related to macroscopic material objects. A believe that a quantum theory of such phenomena is not a socially serious approach and sooner or later shall lead to a deadlock.
6) Why the suggested experimental devices are not mentioned in the standard academic publications of Physics?
I cannot really answer it as I do not have the necessary information. But I could speculate. First it was the time of cold war, so there was a lot of a tendency to hide the discoveries. Probably the authorities where encouraging, hiding the results. Second the inventors rushed in to business applications, without waiting the scientific community to explain and account for their discoveries, which created for them additional troubles.
It is true nevertheless that in their life-time, it was highly improbable that they would get theoretical covering from the Universities. And this type of problem in the asynchronous developments in sciences I discuss in aseparate paragraph. In short I believe that I is not a non-common phenomenon in the history of science. Not all discoveries and innovations in the sciences come in a smooth and convenient way.
7) Why the author is not a by carrier physicist?
Well it is the course of life that makes it so to happen. I started with my interest and research in physics and maths, but I realized soon, that the major issues in physics had already reached a sad dead end, for the present time mainly due to the domination of war applications. So the social sciences seemed to me a more promising area. That is why I acquired the possibility to think free about the physical sciences too.
8) Are the “Free-Energy” devices mentioned in the text safe for practical applications?
I cannot know. Some of them are working for decades in a safe way. Nevertheless their inventors have taken care to function in a smooth non-greedy and mild way as is the case for example with testatika..Without significant theoretical and mathematical work on them by many university groups and for many years, it cannot easily be decided. Maybe irresponsible functioning of them in inappropriate conditions might create explosions or unknown type of ecological pollution. I am in favor of academic research on them, and not in favor of rushing in to business or other demanding applications, with them.
