1) SOLVING THE GLOBAL CO2 PROBLEM: UNIFIED CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM, GRAVITATION AND INERTIA . SOLAR ENERGY STORED IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD.
The full article in pdf format
In the previous post
By prof. Konstantinos Kyritsis
University of Ioannina, Greece
1) INTRODUCTION
This paper is an outline of the online book “FOR A NEW FORM OF INDIRECT SOLAR ENERGY. THE NEW UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION AND NEW ELECTROMAGNETISM” see [C. Kyritsis xx]. This book was written on the occasion of an invitation by the British Aerospace to give a relevant lecture in 3/9/1998 at the University of Lancaster UK. With this paper we do not only discover the new unifying equations of the classical fieldmatter but also it is thus solved initially at the deep theoretical level, the global CO2 problem with new free (indirect solar) energy stored in the gravitational field and extracted also with the help of the electromagnetic field. This endeavor also reinstalls rationality in classical and quantum physics a need that has been mentioned by many inspired physicists
2) PRINCIPLES FOR THE SCIENCE OF PHYSICS FOR A GOOD EVOLVING CIVILIZATION TO FOLLOW IN THIS ARTICLE.
In this paragraph are suggested primary sociological and existential principles for the whole science of physics which is a guide to create scientific physical knowledge and technology. But are also stated optimality cognition principles under which this article is written is so as to discover the physical material reality as deep and as good as possible, by utilizing and integrating in a maximal way all the existing knowledge in various areas of theoretical physics, like electromagnetism, gravitation, quantum mechanics classical theory of fluids etc. and also existing relevant famous or not experiments in these areas, and present it with the greatest simplicity possible. The simplicity is the key to understand deeply the physical reality.
SUCH PRIMARY PRINCIPLES OF THE SCIENCE OF PHYISCS ARE
1) THE SCIENCE OF PHYSICS AND ITS DERIVED TECHNOLOGY SHOULD SERVE THE EVOLUTION NOT ONLY OF THE MORTAL HUMAN PERSONALITY BUT ALSO OF THE IMMORTAL SOUL CONSIOUSNESS.
(Quote from PLATO=”IT IS ONLY THE MIND THAT THROUGH THE TRUE SCIENTFIC KNOWLEDGE LIBERATES THE SOUL”)
2) LAYERED ATOMIC STRUCTURE PRINCIPLE The Material physical reality is structured in discrete orders of scale and layers or densities or resolutions and each layer is made of some size free and permanent material indivisibles. The denser the layer the smaller the constituent particles..
THE OPTIMALITY PRINCIPLES OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE
1) CLEAREST POSSIBLE PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY. HERE THE ONLY PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY IS THAT OF MATTER AND LAYERS OF ATOMIC STRUCTURED MATTTER PRINCIPLE.
2) SIMPLEST POSSIBLE MATHEMATICS FOR MODELS OF PHYSICAL REALITY AND EXPERIMENTAL FACTS
3) AS FEW HYPOTHESIS AND AS SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE SO AS TO EXPLAIN THE EXPERIMENTS
4) MAXIMUM UTILIZATION OF ALL KNOWN EXPERIMENTS AND THEORIES
5) MAXIMUM POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FROM EACH SINGLE EXPERIMENT
6) MAXIMUM POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS AND PREDICTIONS OF OTHER PHYSICAL THEORIES AND FACTS.
7) MAXIMUM AND SIMPLEST POSSIBLE UNIFICATION OF ALL THEORETICAL FRAGMENTS OF RELEVANT PHYSICAL THEORIES BASE NOT SO MUCH IN MATHEMATICS BUT ON CLEAR AND SIMPLE PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY (e.g. matter made from atoms) .
8) MAXIMUM POSSILE RATIONALISM AND PLAUSIBILITY IN PHYSICS AND AS FEW STRANGE AND MIND TRAPPING HYPOTHESES AS POSSIBLE.
9) WE DO NOT APPLY WHAT EVER WE CAN DISCOVER BUT WE DISCOVER WHATEVER WE CAN APPLY FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE IMMORTAL SOUL CONSIOUSNESS
What this article is not: It does not suggest as proved, equations or new perceptions that known and existing experimental facts do not suggest. Nevertheless, we are free to make most probable plausible speculations as long as we do not claim them proved experimentally and thus certain. Furthermore, it does not give directly recipes for technological inventions, but helps the inventors to shape a truer perception of how the material reality and the classical fields function which makes for the easier to discover new technology especially in the era of renewable energy and transportations.
As we shall realize by the end of this article, the new propositions and equations are inevitable consequences of the experimental facts and stated principles.
3) INCORRECT DOCTRINES IN PHYSICS THAT WE HAVE TO GET RID OF, EITHER BECAUSE OF EXPERIMENTS OR PRINCIPLES
In the history of science, it is often that its evolution is prohibited by convenient doctrines that many scientists implicitly believe. A most common such dogma is that “Whatever we have not discovered, it does not exist” The correct of course is that “Whatever we have not discovered, we do not know if it exists”. Here is the main example. Let us assume that we count the layers of matter from the finer particles to the larger size. Many any scientists under this dogma tend to believe that
“Matter starts and consists from the triad of free and permanent particles proton, neutron electron”. But this is a wrong belief. The fact that we have not observed directly smaller free and permanent particles does not mean that matters starts with this triad of particles. The correct belief is of course “We do not know at what depth and with what small free and permanent particles that material physical reality starts”.
To quote here Sir John Marks Templeton “If you think you know it all it is less likely you will learn more” , “The Unknown is not unknowable and it is vastly greater than the known”
This “openness” about how deep is the material reality is of utterly importance and I explain with 2 famous examples! If you think you know all layers of matter than exists and all free and permanent particles end with particles like electron, proton, neutron, photon, then
1) the definition of space will be obligatory and forever be with measurements by photons as Einstein suggested and any curving of the path of photon due to gravitation will be a curvature of the space too. But if not and how deep is matter is open, then the curving of the path of photon is not a forever curvature of space and instead it is more likely that it occurs in a straight without curvature space.
2) Similarly the measurement of the momentum and position of particle will obligatory and forever be with photons, electrons neutrons, protons and the indeterminacy relations of Heisenberg will be forever laws of the physical reality. On the other hand, if how deep is matter is open then the indeterminacy relations are not forever and are simply restrictions of a class of experiments and a state of the art of evolution of physics and its technology.
Obviously the “openness” is in favor of the evolution of sciences towards a better knowledge, while the “closeness” about how deep is material reality is in favor of a not evolving our knowledge.
Another confusion is relevant to the fields like electromagnetic gravitational etc. When a physicist is asked what is e.g. the electromagnetic field, he tends to define it by some mathematical function that gives a map of virtual interactions of electrons or protons in “empty” space. But this is wrong and the ontology of a field does not belong to the ontology of mathematical entities but to the ontology of physical entities. These physicists tend to perceive physical reality as consisting from matter and fields. Except they never give a clear physical ontology definition about what is a physical field, and resort to mathematical ontology instead. If they try to give a purely physical ontology definition of field it turns out that it is a kind of infinite divisible matter, which we know by now that is a wrong concept. Since e.g. the electromagnetic field has energy density in space, momentum and inertia, and waves of energy and inertia in it, these physicists tend to perceive it as …..infinite divisible finer matter. This is again wrong because we know by now, that in nature there is not such a thing as infinite divisible matter. And what is correct? The obvious: That since fields like the electromagnetic field , gravitational field. have energy density in space, momentum and inertia, and waves of energy and inertia in it, they are simply MATTER. We will call the matter of fields in this paper FIELDMATTER, to distinguish it from the coarser matter consisting from the free and permanent triad of particles proton, electron neutron which we will call MOLECULAR MATTER. Obviously the fieldmatter is a finer resolution matter compared to the molecular matter. Under this perspective there is not such a thing as absolute material vacuum, (the quantum vacuum field actually is the unavoidable presence of the gravitational field and it is thus the fieldmatter) but there is a relative concept of vacuum that of “vacuum of molecular matter”. On this there is an article from the famous physicist and Nobel price winner P. Dirac who writes that we are forced by the observables of the physical reality to accept the physical existence of fieldmatter (See [Dirac P.A.M 1951]
As matter that the fields are (fieldmatter) and as there is no infinite divisible matter, obviously they consist from material indivisible (free and permanent) that are particles that we have not yet directly observed and we may call fieldmatter-particles.. In the paragraph about the EPR paradox we will discuss the existence of deeper and finer resolution 3rd field material realms
4) SOME FAMOUS EXPERIMENTS THAT ARE PROOFS OF THE NEW HYPOTHESES BUT WE MISS THIS PERCEPTION, EXACTLY AS WITH THE STORY OF THE OLD BROWNIAN MOTION AND THE EXISTENCE OF ATOMS. THE BASIC TRIAD POLARITY PARTICLES OF THE FIELDMATER.
The discovery of that matter is not infinite divisible but consists of free and permanent particles (initially called atoms) was a one of the greatest discoveries in the history of the physical science and opened new roads of meaningful understanding of nature and an abundant of technology. A Nobel prize was given for this to A. Einstein for his paper o Brownian motion and photoelectric effect (1905) but this Nobel prize should be given to L. E. Boltzmann for his voluminous work on the statistical atomic theory of the gasses almost 50 years earlier Therefore, any enhancement and multiplication of this principle of atomic structure of matter will similarly bring proportionally great new discoveries and even more meaningful understanding of the material reality. And such an enhancement is the layered atomic structure principle of paragraph 2 , in other words that the material reality exists in discrete orders of scales and discrete layers , each layer created by free and permanent material indivisibles or atoms or particles. The denser the layer the smaller the constituent particles.
Applying this principle to the fieldmatter of paragraph 3 we conclude that the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field consists of three types free and permanent material indivisible or particles of positive, negative and neutral charge.
We know that this is true for the molecular matter by the protons, electrons, and neutrons that we may denote here respectively by the symbols (p+ e- n0).
Therefore, we can these fieldmatter particles micro-proton, micro-electron and micro-neutron and denoted them by the symbols (μp+ μe- μn0).
We understand as the main phase of the fieldmatter that we observe as classical field to be that of a gas, not of a liquid or solid-state. But this does not mean that we in the universe will not exist also liquid and sold-state forms of the fieldmatter. Furthermore even as gas we may have various forms exactly as with molecular matter, that we have e.g. plasma-state where the triad of (p+ e- n0) is free and separate, or as e.g. molecular air where they are combined in atoms. Exactly the same occurs with the triad (μp+ μe- μn0) and gas forms of the fieldmatter.
But which experiments prove the existence of these particles? Let us recall that the existence of the material indivisibles of the molecular matter was considered as proved by the Brownian motion of the dust in liquids which was an experiment known since 1820 and realized that it proves the existence of atoms only by 1905. Similarly, now (2021) we should consider the Shroedinger random motion of an isolated electron (see references [Shroedinger equation 1925]) as the proof of the existence of the material indivisibles constitution of the fieldmatter. And why these particles are not all neutral and are positive, negative and neutral? This is proved by the double spit electron experiment (see references [Double-slit experiment 1927] ), where an electron as to moves attracts opposite charge particles of the fieldmatter, which pass as waves through both spits and are photographed with interference wave patterns on the photographic surface The electron itself passes by one only of the two slits.
The next table shows the experiments and what they prove.
Table 1
EXPERIMENT | WHAT IT PROVES |
BROWNIAN MOTION (1820) | PROVES THAT MOLECULAR MATTER IS MADE FROM FREE PERMANENT PARTICLES |
SHROEDINGER MOTION (1925) | PROVES THAT FIELDMATTER IS MADE FROM FREE PERMANENT PARTICLES |
DOUBLE-SLIT ELECTRON EXPERIMENT (1927) | PROVES THAT THE FREE AND PARRMANENT PARTICLES THAT THE FIELDMATTER IS MADE FROM ARE POSITIVE , NEGATIVE AND NEUTRAL |
Here we state for reasons of completeness the Shroedinger equation for an isolated free electron
(see [Shroedinger equation 1925])
The i is the imaginary number unit. The h is the constant of action. The Ψ is the wave function of the Shroedinger. The x, t are the space and time coordinates. The m is the mass of the electron, The V(x.t) is the potential around.
It was not only the Nobel prize winner P. Dirac (see [Dirac P.A.M 1951 ] ) who writes “we are forced (by experiments) to accept the existence of fieldmatter…” but also the great mathematician John von Neumann who formulated the foundations of quantum mechanics, who wrote in his book (see [Neumann J.v. 2018] ) that “…if we assume as background of the randomly moving free and isolated electron an absolute material vacuum then we abandon the principle of sufficient physical causes for physical motions.” Therefore, the fieldmatter exist and we know by now that matter is not infinite divisible. Other great scientists who believed that matter is not infinite divisible but it consist from material indivisible, or that the same is with the electromagnetic and gravitational field are Philosophers of the Hellenistic ages, Newton, Euler, Laplace, Thompson (Lord Kelvin), FitzGerald, Maxwell, Lorentz, Michelson (and Morley), Sir Ed. Whittaker, F.R.S. Dirac etc.
There are some physicist that claimed that the random “dancing” of an isolated electron in what
wrongly thought to be as absolute material quantum vacuum (it is only a vacuum from molecular matter not of the fieldmatter) is due to the human consciousness. Nevertheless, as such experiments can be conducted away from any human, the truth is that the random motion of the electron is due to the fieldmatter. These physicists believe that the ontology of the physical world and universe is not only matter but also consciousness. On this I would agree, because our knowledge is the knowledge of incarnated spiritual existences that we are, and thus the subjective experiential of consciousness is knowledge that can never be completely reduced to only objective material scientific knowledge. And of course conversely the objective scientific knowledge cannot be reduced completely to a subjective experiential knowledge. The community of mathematicians seems that have accepted this division in the ontology of the universe, and in their mathematics they have the ontology of the infinite which can never be material ontology and we may correspond it to consciousness and the ontology of the finite which we may correspond it to matter, as all matter and its particles is only finite.
We may speculate about the sizes of the fieldmatter particles micro-proton, micro-electron and micro-neutron (μp+ μe- μn0). It does not seem that we have any experimental clue for this. But we may notice some similarities. One guess is that e.g. the micro-electron is so smaller than an ordinary electron as a planet is relative to an ordinary electron. Thus a micro-electron might as well be from 10^(20) to 10^(25) times smaller in diameter compared to an ordinary electron.
As the applications of the perceptions of L Boltzmann in the laws and phenomena of the molecular matter gasses was a great revelation in physics, so is also the application of his perceptions in the fieldmatter gasses or classical fields like the electromagnetic and the gravitational field.
Finally, a few speculations about anti-matter. Physicists accept that there are anti-protons, anti-electrons and anti-neutrons. Thus we might also accept the existence of anti-micro-protons, anti-micro-electrons and anti-micro-neutrons, or in short field-antimatter. Therefore the existence also of anti-photons is natural to realize as waves of the field-antimatter, which is different from the molecular antimatter.
5) THE SECOND DEEPER MATERIAL REALITY OF FIELDMATTER OF THE CLASSICAL FIELDS. WHAT IS THE FREQUENCY OF A LAYER OR DESNITY OF MATERIALITY?
For the definition of the frequency of the material layer we will have to find the frequency of their constituent particles. And e.g. here for the molecular matter and for the electron we do not mean the Compton-De Broglie frequency of the electron but we mean the actual average frequency of the spin of the electrons, protons and neutrons. Thus we might be able to calculate the frequency of the molecular matter which is the coarser layer and lower density matter but not yet the frequency of the fieldmatter.
For example of we utilize the data of the classical electron , the frequency fr of the spin of the electron is fr=s*5/(2*m*R^2) where s is the spin s=+,- ½ ĥ , (ĥ=h/2π) , R is the radius, and m its mass. While the Compton-de Broglie frequency fc is fc= (m*c^2)/h.
To make an estimate of the frequency of the visible molecular material reality we enter the data ĥ=h/2π=6.58 *10^(-25) GeV *sec , electron mass me=0.10938356*10^(-31)kgr, and the classical radius of the electron R=re=(1/4πε0)*(e^2)/me*c^2 , where c is the speed of light. So that re=2.817940326727*10^(-13) cm, and s=5.264*10^(-44)joules*sec.
Putting these data in the formula of the frequency of the spin and making the calculations it gives the result of about fr=1.81 Terra Hertz. Of course the data of the classical electron are approximate and average only and so is this frequency of the material reality. The actual frequency might be between 1 Terra Hertz and 1.81 Terra Hertz. As the range of the infrared is between 430 Terra Hz -300 Giga Hz, this frequency is in the range of the infrared.
An increase of the frequency of the visible molecular material reality will have the result of decrease of the radius of electrons, protons and neutrons due to the conservation of the angular momentum. . If the increase in the frequency of the elementary particles of an object is sufficient, this may result in to seemingly invisibility of the material objects, and is might be the base of the idea of beam-transportation of objects in the future technology.
A remark about the frequency of the electron spin calculated here between 1-2 terra Hertz These frequencies have wavelength which is between about 0.5 mm while the dimension of the nitrogen atom is 56 pm, the mean free path in air is 68 nm , thus there is ultrasound in air with that frequency too!
The next table compares the material layers of the fieldmatter and the molecular matter and perceives them as whole different worlds of materiality with possible liquid, and solid state matter in them. It may even be that there exist whole planets made only from fieldmatter!
Table 2: Material reality of at least 2 layers-frequencies.
1st frequency material reality or molecular matter (frequency= the average frequency of the spin)
| Created by the free-permanent triad (proton, neutron, electron) (p+ , e- , n0)
| Periodic System: Yes. Known
| Common wave: Sound
| Common materiality: Solid objects, liquids, gases. planets
| Organic living configurations: Yes Known Biology |
2nd frequency material reality or fieldmatter (frequency= the average frequency of the spin)
| Created by the free-permanent triad of fieldmatter particles (μp+,μe- ,μn0)
| Periodic System: Yes, Unknown
| Common wave: Light
| Common materiality: Electromagnetic , Gravitational fields. Unknown if there are also whole planets made from it with gaseous, liquid and solid states of fieldmatter.
| Organic living configurations: Yes Unknown e.g. Human fieldmatter body. |
6) CLASSICAL LABORATORY SCALE VERSUS QUANTUM MECHANICS MICRO-SCALE. UNIFYING CLASSICAL FIELDS AND INTERACTIONS VERSUS UNIFYING QUANTUM FIELDS AND INTERACTIONS.
It is known in quantum mechanics that the various attempts to unify the microscopic quantum electrodynamic interactions with the weak quantum interactions, plus the gravitational interactions was not of much success. And there are strong reason for this: a) As we shall see in this paper the very linear equations of Maxwell’s electromagnetism need revision and correction before we modify them for the probabilistic behavior in quantum mechanics b) Gravitation is very weak at the microscopic level and it seems as if an irrelevant field interaction at that scale. On the other hand, it much wiser and smart that we must first exhaust all possibilities of deductions that we can draw from the laboratory scale non-microscopic reality before we try to guess the micro-physical reality. There is also a vast advantage in understanding reality at the macroscopic laboratory scale as this leads in discovering new smart low complexity and non-heavy technologies versus the celebrated quantum mechanics approach which requires very heavy technology. Discovering the true and correct equations of the fieldmatter at the macroscopic laboratory scale as a finer material (gaseous) fluid is so natural that any graduate student of fluid mechanics could work out once he chooses correctly the fluid dynamics magnitudes as corresponding to known magnitudes of electromagnetism and gravitation etc. At the laboratory scale we formulate also the linear weak inertial interactions which are Lorentz invariant , and gives as the lucky ability to derive the formulae of special relativity without the axioms of Einstein about constancy of the speed of light in all inertial reference systems and that nothing goes faster than light.
5) REVEALING THE MEANING OF THE POTENTIALS OF ELECTROMAGNETISM AND NEWTONIAN GRAVITATION IN THE FLUID DYNAMICS OF THE FIELDMATTER
(A. The vector potential as charged field matter charge-velocity , the scalar potential as the charged fieldmatter charge-density . The Newtonian scaler gravitational potential as the fieldmatter temperature )
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/25the-maxwell-electromagnetised-aether.html
6) THE NEED TO CORRECT THE CLASSICAL EQUATIONS OF J. C. MAXWELL ELECTROMAGNETISM AND A. EINSTEINS GRAVITATION
The need to solve the CO2 problem of the planet requires this modifications of the equations because of hundreds by now experiments and devices.
Since the time of J. C. Maxwell and A. Einstein there are by now plenty many experiments and inventions that require modification of the equations. And the first such experiments where by N. Tesla relevant not only to his “Magnifying Transmitter” which h considered one of his major discoveries but also relevant to other devices by him. For an account and qualitative explanations of them see the paragraph 23). A good account of may such inventors of this particular type of renewable energy which certainly is renewable due to the solar energy and which is called in the internet “Free energy” may be found after the elaborate and fair work of Allan Sterling (see {Sterling Allan 2021])
It seems that the N. Tesla method for this fieldmatter renewable solar energy was by lightings and his towers, in large or small size (phenomena related probably to his magnifying transmitter) .The same with the similar work of E. Gray . On the other hand, the inventors J. Searl. De Palma, P. Baumann (testatika, Switzerland ) , P.Tewari (India) , L Szabo EBM generator (Hungary).
Another reason for the modification are also experiments and observations in gravitation that do not conform with the Einstein’s gravitation. A major examples is also the discrepancy of Astronomy and geology about the earth’s interior and gravitational mass, discussed in the next paragraph 9.
Furthermore, the class of experiments in quantum mechanics called non-locality and noticed after the EPR paradox is also a strong reason to modify the axioms of special relativity although keep the equations the same.
The next table show the correlation of technologies and theories and the CO2 planetary problem.
PHYSICAL THEORY | DERIVED TECHNOLOGY |
Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics | Nuclear energy, Nuclear propulsion |
Unified fieldmatter (electrogravity) | Tesla’s free solar energy, Electromagnetic propulsion, medicine through fieldmatter sound frequencies |
Finally we should remark that the need to modify the mentioned equations is because also of the optimality principles stated in the paragraph 2
THE OPTIMALITY PRINCIPLES OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE
1) CLEAREST POSSIBLE PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY. HERE THE ONLY PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY IS THAT OF MATTER AND LAYERS OF ATOMIC STRUCTURED MATTTER PRINCIPLE.
2) SIMPLEST POSSIBLE MATHEMATICS FOR MODELS OF PHYSICAL REALITY AND EXPERIMENTAL FACTS
3) AS FEW HYPOTHESIS AND AS SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE SO AS TO EXPLAIN THE EXPERIMENTS
4) MAXIMUM UTILIZATION OF ALL KNOWN EXPERIMENTS AND THEORIES
5) MAXIMUM POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FROM EACH SINGLE EXPERIMENT
6) MAXIMUM POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS AND PREDICTIONS OF OTHER PHYSICAL THEORIES AND FACTS.
7) MAXIMUM AND SIMPLEST POSSIBLE UNIFICATION OF ALL THEORETICAL FRAGMENTS OF RELEVANT PHYSICAL THEORIES BASE NOT SO MUCH IN MATHEMATICS BUT ON CLEAR AND SIMPLE PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY (e.g. matter made from atoms) .
8) MAXIMUM POSSILE RATIONALISM AND PLAUSIBILITY IN PHYSICS AND AS FEW STRANGE AND MIND TRAPPING HYPOTHESES AS POSSIBLE.
9) WE DO NOT APPLY WHAT EVER WE CAN DISCOVER BUT WE DISCOVER WHATEVER WE CAN APPLY FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE IMMORTAL SOUL CONSIOUSNESS
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/24review-of-maxwells-electromagnetised.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/23-new-macroscopic-universal-neutral.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/29-navier-stokes-equations-of-unifies.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/27-newtons-universal-attraction.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/210-new-laws-of-interaction-of-matter.html
7) THE FORMULAS OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY REDISCOVERED WITHOUT THE AXIOMS OF EINSTEIN. THE ROLE OF THE SPIN OF THE ELECTRON IN DRAGING THE FIELDMATTER.
(A. The same previous interpretations keys of the electromagnetic potentials applies for neutrons too and gives a Dalambertian wave equation , similar to that of Maxwells electromagnetism , which has Lorentz group as symmetries (or automorphisms). This is a kind of linear wave-inertia invariant to the Lorentz transformations. It is a linear coupling of molecular particles and fieldmatter waves as we mentioned and not equivalent to the DeBroglie and Schroendinger particle-wave duality of quantum mechanics which is at smaller time and space scale. . This easily, with the same as by Einsteins calculations , leads to special relativity formulae and E=mc^2. BUT it is not utilizing any assumption of special relativity axiom, actually it holds Galilean relativity, It is also not utilizing the axiom that nothing goes faster than light. What the Michelson-Morley experiment then really proves is that the fieldmatter follows earthly rotation till a significant height, like the earthly atmosphere. The light aberration occurs as well because the follow of the fieldmatter to the earths rotation is only up to some height ).
Table
x1
|
THEORY |
Absolute bound
of light velocity |
Material existence of the fieldmatter |
Ability to understand the mechanism of bending of
light by gravitation |
Ability to discover solar energy stored in he field
matter as heat |
|
Einstein’s special relativity |
YES |
NO |
NO |
NO |
|
Linear Lorentz invariant inertia |
NO |
YES |
YES |
YES |
Table
x2
|
THEORY |
Fieldmatter waves and molecular matter particle coupling |
Experimentally verified formulae |
Relativity of inertial systems |
Lorentz group invariance |
|
Einstein’s special relativity |
NO |
YES |
YES Lorentz transformations |
YES |
|
Linear Lorentz invariant inertia |
YES |
YES (same formulae) |
YES Galilean transformations |
YES |
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/09/22-how-to-derive-special-relativity.html
8) SPECULATIONS OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS IN PHYSICS HAPPENING AFTER 2045-2050 TOGETHER WITH 2 NEW NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS
(A. Predictions for 20245-2050 give that the average living standards of china and india will reach that of Europe and USA B. Predictions for 20245-2050 give that the artificial intelligence will have reached in computation power that of the single material human brain (but not that of the soul) )
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/212-remarks-on-cognitive-social-and.html
9)
10
THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS OF THE UNIFIED FIELDMATTER AT THE LABORATORY SCALE. UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM, GRAVITATION AND INTERTIAL WEAK INTERACTIONS.
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/24review-of-maxwells-electromagnetised.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/23-new-macroscopic-universal-neutral.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/29-navier-stokes-equations-of-unifies.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/27-newtons-universal-attraction.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/210-new-laws-of-interaction-of-matter.html
|
THEORY |
NEWTONIAN UNIVERSAL
ATTARCTION |
EINSTEINS GRAVITATION |
FIELDMATTER HEAT
GRAVITATION |
|
KEY SOURCE OF
GRAVITATION |
QUANTITYOF MOLECULAR MATTER |
MASS-ENERGY |
HEAT OF THE FIELD MATTER |
THE PARADOX OF ASTRONOMY-GEOLOGY INCOSISTENCY AND DISCREPANCY ABOUT EARTH IS RESOLVED:
We state this paradox and its resolution as a dialogue of a Top Astronomer, Top Geologist and the author
Top Astronomer: I hope that you know dear geologist that my astronomy does not support your claim that earth is full of magma.
Top Geologist: And why astronomy does not support it?
Top Astronomer: Do you agree with the astronomic assumption of the origin of planets as solar nebula firry plasma balls?
Top Geologist: Yes we believe it is true.
Top Astronomer: Alright then, here are the stages of cooling of the plasma ball with all the simulated calculations of material states from the laws of physics.
1) First stage all the ball is gaseous plasma b) 2nd stage the spherical surface till some depth is cooling to molecular matter magma c) 3rd stage the spherical surface is cooling to solid state molecular matter till some depth. This so because gaseous plasma state is not good conductor of heat, so before all the ball is cooling to magma, first a spherical shell will be cooling to solid state. Furthermore because of the rotation of the ball the tangential surface tensions are maximum at the rotational poles thus there are expected some solid-state holes say of 70 kilometers diameter. d) 4th stage because of the holes and because the plasma matter continuous to cool to magma from inside , the plasma state ball reduces its diameter much less to the diameter of the solid-state spherical shell, so eventually the spherical shell is cooling to solid-state matter from inside too e) 5th final stage a solid spherical shells crated at about 1/3 of the radius while the plasma ball is reduced at a very small ball at the center which may be called inner sun of the planet earth. The rest of the inner space is full of atmospheric air as the outer atmospheric air.
Top Geologist: Hmmm, I see your calculations they are correct! It should be like this indeed and not full of magma. Actually you predict magma only till about 1250 kilometers deep and I assure you that experimental geology through the volcanos has not real proof that magna exist in more depth. We only assume that magma will be till the center. BUT I have 2 major objections …from astronomy that make your predictions fall apart. 1) If there are 70 km diameter holes at the poles how is it that the ocean e.g. at the north pole does fall inside the hollow earth? 2) If the solid spherical shell is about 1/3 of the radius then the inertial and gravitational mass of earth would be much less. In particular, the total quantity of molecular matter is the next proportion of the quantity of a full sphere matter
((4/3*pi*3^3)-(4/3*pi*2^3))/(4/3*pi*3^3)=1-(2/3)^3=0.7125. Thus a hollow earth has about only 70% mass compared to a full of magma earth! And Newtonian gravitation has indeed measured as mass of earth that of a full earth not 70% only of a hollow earth.
Top Astronomer: I admit that you have put me in a difficult position at the corner as Galileo also was put when they objected to him that how is it possible that a spherical earth hovers in space and does not …..fall down, or the night that earth turns around we do not …..fall in the sky?
The author : Let me dear astronomer give a resolving answer to the Geologist based on our new and deeper theory of gravitation of the present article. As I mentioned above the true source of gravitation is the heat of the fieldmatter rather than the quantity of molecular matter which created heat in the fieldmatter. Now it is known in meteorology that the molecular air temperature follows the n-spherical harmonics and reverses gradient many times as we go from the earth surface to the end of the atmosphere. It is highly probably that the same reversing of gradient occurs to the fieldmatter temperature which is the source of gravitation, thus it may very well be that the gravitation from the inside solid surface of the spherical shell is outward instead of towards the center of earth. Thus if there are inner oceans at the polar holes their weight would cancel out and be in balance. Now the answer that the reduced quantity of molecular matter to about 70% will still have inertial and gravitational mass of 100% full earth is answered a s follows. We already know from the formulae of special relativity for a particle with velocity close to that of light thus with double mass to that of the rest mass that the inertial and gravitational mass is not in fixed proportionality with the quantity of matter. We assume also as right the assumption of Einstein that the gravitational mass of a body is about equal to its inertial mass. Here is why a 70% quantity of matter hollow earth has inertial and gravitational mass as if 100% full sphere. We had calculated that the frequency of the spin of the electrons, protons and neutrons is at the range 1-2 terahertz of infrared. Thus at this frequency the molecular matter of earth absorbs energy from the infrared of the solar radiation, it passes it to the spin which in its turn passes it to heat of the fieldmatter thus to gravitation. The inner space of the hollow earth would then have higher fieldmatter temperature to that due to simply the quantity of matter of the inner molecular atmosphere exactly like a greenhouse effect in the fieldmatter temperature. Thus earth would gravitate more due to the greenhouse effect of fieldmatter temperature due to the solar radiation t 1-2 terahertz. This could explain why we measure astronomically a higher by about 30% gravitational and inertial mass of earth! This is the very important role of the solar radiation to the earths gravitation.
Top Geologist: I can’t believe that you gave a way to resolve it, even qualitatively. This is the most interesting thing I have heard in me entire carrier! You should take the Nobel prize!
THE LORENTZ INVARIANT LINEAR APPROXIMATION 1/3: COMPRESSION OR “SOUND” WAVES ΟF “NEUTRAL LIGHT” IN THE NEUTRAL (inviscid) FIELDMATTER. THE LINEAR WEAK INERTIAL INTERACTIONS AT THE LABORATORY SCALE.
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/24review-of-maxwells-electromagnetised.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/23-new-macroscopic-universal-neutral.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/29-navier-stokes-equations-of-unifies.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/27-newtons-universal-attraction.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/210-new-laws-of-interaction-of-matter.html
THE LORENTZ INVARIANT LINEAR APPROXIMATION 2/3: THE FIELDMATTER-MOLECULAR MATTER PARTICLE LINEAR WAVE COUPLING INERTIA. THE FORMULAE OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY REDISCOVERED WITHOUT THE AXIOMS OF EINSTEIN. CORRECTING WHAT WE BELIEVE THAT THE SPECIAL RELATIVITY PROVES : THE ROLE OF THE SPIN OF THE ELECTRON IN DRAGING THE FIELDMATTER AND THE SPEED OF ΤΗΕ LIGHT.
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/09/22-how-to-derive-special-relativity.html
THE LORENTZ INVARIANT LINEAR APPROXIMATION 3/3: HOW THE OLD LINEAR MAXWELL AND NEWTON EQUATIONS ARE LINEAR APPROXIMATIONS OF THE NEW UNIFYING EQUATIONS.
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/24review-of-maxwells-electromagnetised.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/23-new-macroscopic-universal-neutral.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/29-navier-stokes-equations-of-unifies.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/10/27-newtons-universal-attraction.html
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2013/01/210-new-laws-of-interaction-of-matter.html
RESTORING RATIONALISM IN PHYSICS. HOW THE OLD LORENTZ INVARIANT APROXIMATE ELECTROMAGNETISM AND LORENTZ IVARIANT LINEAR WAVE INERTIA (OLD SPECIAL RELATIVITY’ FORMULAE) AS WELL AS THE NEW UNIFYING ELECTROGRAVITITY ARE ALL UNDER GALILEAN RELATIVITY.
There is a great number of sound thinking physics and authors of many books that have pointed out to restore the rationalism in physics after the intervention of Einstein, and some particular interpretations of quantum mechanical formulations. We list here some of the very famous irrationalities
IRRATIONALITES:
1) “The random DANCING of the ISOLATED LECTRON IN THE ‘QUANTUM VACUUM” This is based on the elimination of a vast part of the physical material l reality that of the fieldmatter and according to von Neumann is equivalent to abandoning the principle of sufficient physical causes for the physical phenomena. P. Dirac also pointed out that this is absurd (see in references [Dirac P.A.M 1951 ] )
2) The basic 3 particles of molecular matter as either waves OR particles This irrationality comes from the OR alternatives of using Shroendinger wave functions formulation OR Heisenberg matrix algebra of particles, that J.v. Neumann proved to be equivalent. Still this OR alternative is a mathematical ontology alternative not a physical ontology As we have pointed out in this article the physical ontology is that a electron-proton-neutron when moving is a coupling of both a particle of the molecular matter and a wave of the fieldmatter. For the photon the OR alternative comes from the choice of the time scale that we describe the phenomenon.
3) In the double split experiment, the electron passes as particle only one slit but as wave both slits. And all this absurdity because we assume around the electron a material vacuum. As we have pointed out in this article the physical ontology is that a electron-proton-neutron when moving is a coupling of both a particle of the molecular matter and a wave of the fieldmatter.
4) Nothing goes faster than light (it blocks much of the understanding of the physical reality thus much of benevolent technology also like that of solar renewable energy from the gravitational field. (There are experimental violations of this).
5) The Lorentz transformations are transformations of change of inertial reference systems. This irrationality is a very unlucky twist of the correct mathematical interpretation which is the active interpretation as symmetries of the D Alembert wave equation.
6) Once a differential equation describes a phenomenon it is so in all scales of space and time. This is a fixed disadvantage of the mathematical models of matter based on the infinite. That is why we have to discover the digital differential calculus without the infinite (see references [Kyritsis C. 2019] )
7) To measure space and time is obligatory to use photons. The space and time are concepts designed not to depend on the state of the art of the discoveries of physical science and its technology).
8) To be honest the Nobel prize for the proof that matter consists of indivisible atoms should be given almost half a century earlier to Boltzmann that with 10s and 10s of pages had proved and derived from the hypotheses of the existence of atoms many known experiments in the theory of gasses and not only the Brownian motion that Einstein derived.
On the other hand here are some speculations that might seem strange but most probably are closer to the truth about our universe.
MORE TRUE SPECULATIVE ORIENTATIONS THAT MIGHT LOOK UNUSUAL
1) Finer matter (fieldmatter) might have created the coarser matter (molecular matter)
2) The world is both matter and consciousness as the ontology of mathematics is both the finite (matter) and the infinite (consciousness).
3) I would not be surprised of experiments with humans during meditation or not, would prove that the quality of the Human Consciousness does affect the frequency of the spin of the molecular matter, although filedmatter also can do so. The higher the quality of the consciousness the higher the frequency.
4) For human’s time should be based on their subjectivity e.g. average time unit that almost all the cells in the body are renewed, rather than material clocks.
5) I would agree with Einstein that the concept of Euclidean rigid space and rigid uniform material time should not be absolute and might depend on the functions of a specific number of frequencies or densities material realities, but the way he did eliminated the classical space and time was wrong as it blocked a better understanding of the material reality and explanation of the renewable energy inventions
6) We might as well state a principle of anti-relativity Each system of references is different from any other when describing the physical phenomena as far as highlighting simplicity of the underlying laws. E.g. Ptolemy's geo-centric astronomy versus Newton’s solar centered astronomy. From this point of view A. Einstein is the Ptolemy of physics (bizarre phenomenological and conceptual confusion) While N. Tesla is like the little understood modern Archimedes.
22) HIGHER DENSITY AND FREQUENCY FIELDMATTER. NON-LOCALITY AND EPR (Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen) PARADOX AS A PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF DEEPER FREQUENCY 2ND AND FINER FIELDMATTER. THE PARICLES ARE CHORDS OF HIGHER FFREQUENCIES MATERIAL LAYERS. IS IT AN EXPERIMENTAL PROOF THAT THE AXIOM “NOTHIG GOES FASTER THAN LIGHT” IS WRONG?
In the history of physic there were experiments that proved something important but this was not realized but almost one century later. One famous example was the Brownian motion discovered around 1820, which it was realized only in 1905 that proved the existence of atoms. In this paragraph we discuss that the EPR paradox is another such class of experiments. In such cases of the history o physics holds the rule: “We do not believe what we see but we see what we believe”
In 1935 Einstein trying to prove incorrect the formulations of quantum mechanics for the physics of elementary particles, he devised a thought experiment where two particles after some quantum phenomenon in entangled state , where separated to a great distance e.g.one in Tokyo and the other in New York. Because of a laws of quantum mechanics any measurement in the position or momentum of the one would predict that of the other, which proves an interaction faster than light. And as he was sure that the axiom of his special relativity that nothing goes fster than light was proved experimentally he concluded that the formation of quantum mechanics is incorrect and incomplete. See in references [EPR paradox] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox.
Nevertheless, we know by now with the current article that the axiom of Einstein that nothing goes faster than light is not really proved from the formulae of special relativity (see paragraph 19) and on the contrary such an interaction faster than the light may occur and is included in the formulation of quantum mechanics know by now as non-locality, and non-local interactions. This paradox did not remained at the level of thought experiments but was tested and verified experimentally (See [Aspect, Alain 1982], [Hensen, B, et al. (October 2015)], [Giustina, M, et al. (December 2015)], [Rowe MA, et al. (February 2001)], [Shalm, LK, et al. (December 2015).]) Modern interpretations of the non-locality of quantum mechanics tend to cover-up this discrepancy and claim that non-locality does necessarily violates the axiom that nothing goes faster than light. But the truth is that it does prove the axiom that nothing goes faster than light as wrong and this is the reason that Einstein noticed it. This class of experiments of non-locality prove nevertheless something even more important: Because indeed all interactions are eventually reduced to local interactions which is the base of the physical causality through matter, ,the explanation of the non-locality is that it exist at least one more finer density (and higher frequency) material layer beyond the field matter of the classical fields which again by a guess of minimalism and simplicity would consists from a new triad od free and permanent particles of negative positive and neutral polarity that we may call nano-electron , nano-proton and nano-neutron and denoted by (νp+ νe- νn0). Thus so far matter exist in at least 3 layers or densities and created by 3 triads of particles that we have denoted by proton-electron-neutron (p+ e- n0) micro-electron etc (μp+ μe- μn0) mano-electron etc (νp+ νe- νn0). Then the explanation of the class of non-locality experiments is that the phenomenally non-local interaction are essentially local interactions through “light” waves of the 3rd layer matter (2nd fieldmatter) which naturally is expected to travel faster than the light of the 1st fieldmatter (classical electromagnetic field). This also includes the postulate that the particles are a “chord” of material frequencies and knot of vortex motions in many layers material realities We should remark also that this class of experiments do not exclude the possibility of a 3rd higher frequency material reality (pico-electron etc) .
1 8) PREDICTION OF SOLAR ENERGY STORED IN THE FIELDMATTER AS FIELDMATTER HEAT AND GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ENERGY, AND N. TESLA’S FORGOTTEN DISCOVERIES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY. THE TRUE SOLUTION OF THE CO2 AND O2 PROBLEMS IN THE PLANETARY ATMOPSHERE IN OUR OPEN CIVILIZATION.
As we wrote in the paragraph 9 the main source of gravitation is the heat of the fieldmatter, and in particular for earth it seems that 30% of it is due to the solar radiation at the 1-2 terahertz infrared rather than due to the quantity of matter of earth. The molecular quantity of matter of earth by the spin of its 3 basic particles , electron , proton neutron and friction in the fieldmatter create the heat for the gravitation. The spin rotation of protons , neutrons, electrons in the field matter by friction create heat in the field matter , which in its turn creates the gravitation that is why the Newtonian gravitational field . depends on the quantity of matter. The frequency of this spin as we mentioned is about 1 terra Herz in the infrared. The average spin rotational or angular momentum is constant. The energy of the spin is replenished by absorption of energy of solar light waves at the same infrared frequency of 1 terra Hertz. It can also be replenished by the molecular matter heat that randomly is converted by collisions to spin of the above triad of particles. In addition, the traveling of light waves or photons inside a hollow body is not entirely without friction which also adds to the heat of the fieldmatter or gravitational potential energy. From this point of view, the gravitational potential energy is renewable as long as solar energy is stored in it.
Therefore, we may predict that there devices that can extract the fieldmatter heat of earth. How this can be done? Let us look at how nature extract heat from the molecular air. The best known phenomenon is the tornado, with an upward helix motion of the air. The tornado thus has a shape of a cone, and as the air moves upward a detonation phenomenon occurs as it moves from faster and smaller diameter parts of the cone to a slower and larger diameter part of the cone. As it is known a detonation of air will drop its temperature and heat will be subtracted from it. This hear it converted to rotational kinetic energy of the air which sustains the rotation of the tornado in spite the friction. We may call this well-known phenomenon as the cone-expansive tornado heat effect.
Now we may predict that a similar phenomenon in much smaller space and time scale can be created in the fieldmatter. It requires of course as external molecular matter trigger by the force density terms in the Navier-Stokes fieldmatter unified equations. For the cone-expansive tornado heat effect to occur in the fieldmatter the molecular matter trigger could be either rotating magnets, or disc-shaped coils, or asymmetric rotating discs that apply centripetal forces to electrons etc Furthermore such smaller cone-expansive tornado heat effect could occur n the lightning effect in the molecular vacuum, or even in air. We also me predict that the fall of the fieldmatter temperature will induce a smaller fall in the involved molecular matter temperature which when it happens is called cold electricity. In fact it seems that all the above methods have been discovered the last century by various inventors since the time of N. Tesla. Nevertheless, none of them including N. Tesla was acknowledged as a valid and understood invention due the luck of the current article correct physical interpretations and equations of electromagnetism and gravitation and the prevail of Einsteins theories. On could say for the many inventors who were suppressed in this way that ” If you are 3 steps ahead they declare you as insane, if you are 2 steps ahead they declare you a crook, if you are one step ahead, they ignore you, but if you are one step behind they might give you the Nobel prize.”
A good account of may such inventors of this particular type of renewable energy which certainly is renewable due to the solar energy and which is called in the internet “Free energy” may be found after the elaborate and fair work of Allan Sterling (see {Sterling Allan 2021])
It seems that the N. Tesla method for this fieldmatter renewable solar energy was by lighnings and his towers, in large or small size (phenomena related probably to his magnifying transmitter) . The same with the similar work of E. Gray . On the other hand, the inventors J. Searl. De Palma, P. Baumann (testatika, Switzerland ) , P.Tewari (India) , L Szabo EBM generator (Hungary) , are utilizing rotating magnets to crate the fieldmatter cone-expansive tornado heat effect.
We should mention also that the various HHO devices with special types of resonating electrolysis and also devices that utilize hard treatment of water to extract extra heat should be unserstood as utilizing the fieldmatter cone-expansive tornado heat effect at a molecular microscopic scale.
Furthermore the fieldmatter cone-expansive tornado heat effect could be created in the neutral fieldmatter as well not only on the charged or electromagnetiszed, by other types of rotating machines. There are inventors who claim that they have discovered such renewable energy devices and they call them gravitational generators.
It is ecologically and planetary quality design to have rules of uniform distribution on the surface of the planet of extraction of such renewable fieldmatter energy from the potential gravitational energy (stored and renewed by solar energy) by a large number of decentralized installations as much better and safer than centralized and concentrated installations. Happily, direct calculations show that even if the extraction of such energy is less than what already is lost as molecular matter heat radiation of the planet, it is sufficient to power the electricity of all the humanity!
Besides the renewable solar energy from the gravitational field , these new Navier-Stokes unifying equations and perceptions about the fieldmatter, suggest also new fieldmatter propulsion, similar to the rockets propulsion, except now at the layer of the fieldmatter.
For example by creating small fieldmatter tornado with discshaped or cone shaped coils, or rotating magnets, and pusihing it in a direction through the momentum conservation of matter (either fieldmatter or molecular matter) a molecular matter vehicle would travel in the road, in the sea, in the atmosphere, or outside the planet. If flying discs exist as many eyewitnesses claim, then this is how they should function.
9) WHY SUCH DEVELOPMENTS OF SUCH NEW PHYSICS ARE BETTER THAN THE CURRENT PHYSICS? MORAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES OF THE MODERN PHYSICS. TRANSPORATIONS AND RENEWABLE ENERGY MODELS.
It is obvious now through this paper why the axioms of Einstein’s special relativity in an utterly unfortunate way prohibited theoretically the existence of the constituent particles of the fieldmatter (μp+ μe- μn0) (because they also travel faster than the light) and thus all the Navier-Stokes equations of the unified fieldmatter and electrogravity that would lead to the solar energy of Tesla and the fieldmatter propulsion could not be discovered theoretically. Instead the Einsteins special relativity was used in the Nuclear energy and Nuclear propulsion. This is very unfortunate because Einstein himself was against the nuclear power and energy and in favor of the renewable energy.
PHYSICAL THEORY | DERIVED TECHNOLOGY |
Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics | Nuclear energy, Nuclear propulsion |
Unified fieldmatter (electrogravity) | Tesla’s free solar energy, Electromagnetic propulsion, medicine through fieldmatter sound frequencies |
It is important to realize also that the current unifying Navier-Stokes equations that any physicist is somehow obliged to apply once he realizes the physical ontology (namely the fieldmatter) behind the electromagnetic and gravitational fields do not give direct recipes for derived technological devices. The main reason is that the force terms in the complete non-linear equations of the coupling and interaction of fieldmatter and molecular matter are undetermined and their exact for has to be discovered with experiments.
Nevertheless the whole approach in this paper is revealing and enlightening and remains in the future generations of experimental physicist to discover the relevant technology, solve the CO2 problem of the planet and bring humanity to the next model of transportation through fieldmatter propulsion.
SPECULATE ABOUT HHO TOO AND WATER TREATMENTS.
The unified theory in this article is not based on new inventions of mathematics but deeper perception of well-known and simple physical material ontology
THE UNFYING REALITY OF FIEKDMATTER (GAS) | THE INTERACTIONS THAT ARE UNIFIED |
CHARGED FIELDMATTER | ELECTROMAGNETISM |
HEAT NEUTRAL FIELDMATTER PHENOMENA | GRAVITATION |
FLUID DYNAMICS PHENOMENA OF NEUTRAL FIELDMATTER | WEAK INERTIAL INTERCATIONS |
1) Child mortality, disappearance, and slavery.The 7 main problems of humanity now are:
2) Overpopulation
3) Outdated nutrition model based on animal tyranny or animal slavery.
4) Degradation and destruction of the ecological biosphere.
5) Outdated energy model with high CO2 emmissions.
6) Climate crisis based on CO2 emissions.
7) Over-monetization of life and a monetary system, centrally controlled in a non-democratic way from central banks and commercial banks that have the privilege to issue and create money from nothing without the democratic public approval and create periodically destruction of the economy by debt crisis.
8) Brutal or subtly hidden tyranny
A LIST ADVANTAGES OF THE CURRENT APPROACH COMPARED TO OLDER PHYSCAL THEORIES LIKE SPECIAL AND GENERAL REALTIVITY AND MAXWELLS ELECTROMAGNETISM.
0) At least the same experimental verifications
1) More comprehensive physical material ontology
2) Many well-known solutions to Navier-Stokes with various types of symmetries
3) Simpler mathematics
4) More and surprising predictions and resolutions of paradoxes (like a) Tesla renewable energy and 7 other major inventors, b) The weak neutral light or fieldmatter sound c) That 30% of the earths gravitation and inertial mass is due to the heating by solar radiation at 1-2 Terahertz infrared etc.)
5) No planetary CO2 problem
6) New fieldmatter propulsion safer than the nuclear propulsion
7) Simpler and smarter technology of renewable energy
8) Since solar renewable energy from the fieldmater (gravitational and electromagnetic) is at significantly lower cost (even lower than coal’s cost) and as also this form is not capital intensive, it is the number one candidate to develop and deal with the CO2 emissions and climate crisis on earth.
I am also in favor of shorting the gap between academic science and groups (military or business industrial) that practice applications of similar devices without the adequate academic scientific covering of them.
I am in favor of discovering only what we can apply for the good of all versus applying whatever we can discover.
Overpopulation peak and the new energy models:
The charts of the increase of the global population in the planet, suggest, from a simple logistic-curve best-fit, that it is quite probable that the peak of the population in the planet, can be in the time interval between the next 60 years and the next 2 centuries or more. We remarked about the fact that the groups in power in the various societies have not yet solved the problems of the old energy models. The failure to develop in the universities, and industries, the new energy models, as alternatives to oil and nuclear energy, before the population peak in the planet, might have, as I speculate, grave consequences, in relation to the developments in the humanity after the population peak. I think that the more these, new energy models, are understood and developed, the more, the distribution of the resources in the planet shall be fair, humanly meaningful, and the more, peace, democracy and intelligence shall prevail in humanity. Without this perspective, in the human civilization, life in humanity and the planet after the population peak, might be seriously threaten, due to unbearable differences in wealth, energy resources, technology differences, increased mutual hate, terrorism, and despair. Therefore, it is critical that such new energy models should most probably be developed, before the population peak, and this should happen with the right procedures and the global scientific consensus.
I consider that I follow the strategy of I. Newton in “Principia Mathematica” when formulating and presenting the new physics. In other words Newton formulated his universal attraction in classical Euclidean geometry and not in his new invented differential and integral calculus, otherwise it would be easily and widely understood. It was much later that it was reformulated in his symbolic differential and integral calculus
Similarly I formulate the new physics in the classical differential and integral calculus that involves the infinite as everybody is familiar with it and in my newly discovered natural or digital differential and integral calculus which avoids the infinite (see [Kyritsis C……] . But it is obvious that given sufficient time and acceptance the unifying NS-equations can be reformulated in the natural or digital differential and integral calculus which is by far more fair , exact , and with a mathematical ontology closer to the physical ontology.
10) CONCLUSIONS
In this outline we indicated how to 1) model the classical fields of gravitation and electromagnetism as fieldmatter 2) Correct and unify the equations of classical Maxwell electromagnetism and Newtonian gravitation , while abandoning the Einstein’s gravitation 3) Re-derive the special relativity formulae, as good approximations under special conditions but without the axioms of relativity or that nothing goes faster than light 4) Speculate about solar renewable energy possible to extract from the gravitational field either directly or through the electromagnetic field and electromagnetic devices and the existence new electromagnetic fieldmatter propulsion devices. This would be the true theoretical source of the solution of the global planetary CO2 problem .
Acknowledgments. I would like to thank the Laboratory of Hydrodynamics and the Laboratory of Aerodynamics of National Technical University of Athens, for their support in the analysis of the Navier Stokes equations, and general encouragement in the present research. Also the Software Laboratory of the Department of Electrical Engineering for the computer support. I want also to thank the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the National Technical University of Athens for the consulting on magnets, and electric engines. I would like also to thank Dr D. Matravers of the Departments of computer science and mathematics, at the University of Portsmouth, that although devoted to relativistic physics, he was kind enough, to ask me for a lecture and presentation of the present ideas, at their early stage of creation during 1996-97 at the University of Portsmouth. In addition, I would like to thank, Dr Evans, from the B.A. that after communicating with Dr M. Duffy, invited me in UK , and the University of Lancaster, that provided the facilities for the Lecture during 1998. Finally I would like to thank all the friends, e.g. like St. Dimitriou, and researchers like Dr H. Aspden, and many other people, that with discussions, enthusiasm, and encouragement, contributed somehow to take the decision to write this paper.
REFERENCES
[Aberration of light ] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_of_light
[Aspect, Alain 1982];
Dalibard, Jean; Roger, Gérard \date =December 1982 (1982). "Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using
Time- Varying Analyzers". Physical Review Letters. 49 (25):
1804–1807. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..49.1804A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804.
[Aspden,H] a)Anti-gravity electronics Electronic &Wireless WorldJanuary
1989 b)The theory of AntigravityPhysical
Essays Volume
4,number 1 1991.http://www.aspden.org/` http://www.energysci
ence.co.uk/books.htmlhttp://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_4_8_1.html
[ Batchelor (1967) ] pp. 147 & 154.
[Bohm D.-Vigier J.P.] “Model of
the causal interpretation of quantum theory in terms of a fluid with irregular
fluctuations “Physical Review 96pp 208-216
(1954)
[B. DePalma experiment].
[Dirac P.A.M 1951 ] Is there
an eather?Proc.Roy.Soc. A.209 ,291 ,(1951)
[Donald
Reed] Beltrami vector fields in Electrodynamics: A reason
for re-examining The structural
foundations of classical field physics? Modern
Nonlinear Optics, Part 3, Second Edition: Advances in Chemical Physics, Volume 119.
Edited by Myron W.
Evans. Series Editors: I. Prigogine and
Stuart A. Rice. Copyright #
2001 John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.
ISBNs: 0-471-38932-3 (Hardback);
0-471-23149-5
[Double-slit experiment 1927] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
[EPR
paradox] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox
[Hammar
experiment] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammar_experiment
[Hayasaka,H.Tackeuchi S.]
Phys. Rev. Lett 63, 2701 (1989)[
[Hensen, B, et al. (October 2015)]. "Loophole-free Bell inequality
violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres". Nature. 526 (7575): 682–686. arXiv:1508.05949. Bibcode:2015Natur.526..682H. doi:10.1038/nature15759. PMID 26503041.
[Heras
Ricardo 2016] Lorentz transformations
and the wave equation
European
Journal of Physics 37(2):025603
[Giustina, M, et al. (December 2015)]. "Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's
Theorem with Entangled Photons". Physical Review Letters. 115 (25):
250401. arXiv:1511.03190. Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115y0401G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401. PMID 26722905.
[ Itzycson ClaudeZuber Jean-Bernard] Quantum Field Theory
[Naudin J] http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm
[Kyritsis Constantine 1998: The Lancaster
Lecture. http://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.gr/2012/10/20-from-lancasterlecture.html
http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.htm
[KYRITSIS C 1984]
On Special Relativity's Second Postulate, September 1984 Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 9, 343-352
[KYRITSIS C. 2018 ]
The solutions of the 3rd and 4th Clay Millennium problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07265
[KYRITSIS C. 2017 ]
On the 4 th Clay millennium problem: Proof of the regularity of the
solutions of the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, based on the conservation
of particles. Journal of Scientific Research and Studies
Vol. 4(11), pp. 304-317, November, 2017 http://www.modernrespub.org/jsrs/content/2017/November.htm
[KYRITSIS C. 2017]
An Axiomatic System for a Physical or Digital but
Continuous 3-Dimensional Euclidean Geometry, Without Infinite Many Points. World Journal of Research and Review
(WJRR) ISSN:2455-3956, Volume-5, Issue-4, October 2017 Pages
31-43
http://cris.teiep.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/1590?locale=el It is a new axiomatic system for the digital
synthetic (not-analytic) Euclidean geometry.
[KYRITSIS C. 2019 ]
An
Introduction to the Natural Differential and Integral Calculus, without the
Infinite. Journal of Regional & Socio-Economic
Issues . Oct2019, Vol. 9 Issue 3,p70-89.20p. http://www.jrsei.yolasite.com/ It is an article and a preliminary
version of a future detailed book on digital calculus
[KYRITSIS C. 2018]
THE SOLUTION OF THE 3 RD CLAY MILLENNIUM
PROBLEM. A SHORT PROOF THAT P not equal to NP = EXPTIME IN THE CONTEXT OF
ZERMELO-FRANKEL SET THEORY. International Journal of Pure and Applied
Mathematics VOL 120(3):497-510. January 2018 DOI: 10.12732/ijpam.v120i3.17 https://ijpam.eu/contents/2018-120-3/17/17.pdf
It is the solution of the famous 3rd Millennium
problem, one of the 7 most difficult unsolved problems of the 21st century.
It refers to if the complexity level of non-deterministic polynomial time , and
it is proved that it cannot be reduced to polynomial time but it is
exponential time. This verifies that the standard methods of encryption and
security in the internet are safe.
[Landau & Lifshitz (1987)] pp. 44–45.
[Lorentz gauge condition] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_gauge_condition
[Lindemann , Peter D.Sc.]“The free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity” .
Published by Clear Tech, Inc.PO Box 37 , Metaline Falls,WA 99153 (509)
446-2353.
[Lorentz. H. A.]
"Electromagnetic
phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than that of
light" Proceedings of the
Academy of sciences if Amsterdam, 6, 1904
[Magnetic vector potential]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_vector_potential
[Meyl Konstantin 2000] Free energy in the Tesla towers and electromagnetic
scalar waves http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=50_Experimental&page=1&sublevel=0
[Michelson-Gale-Pearson-experiment]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Gale%E2%80%93Pearson_experiment
[Michelson-Morley-experiment]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-Morley_experiment
[Misner C.W.,Thorn K.SWheeler
J.A.] Gravitation Freeman
W.H.1973
[ Mizuno Tadahiko] (Hokkaido University) Free
energy from high voltage water electrolysis
Japanese Journal of applied
physics http://www.lenrcanr.org/acrobat/MizunoThydrogenev.pdf
[Navier-Stokes equation] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations
[Neumann J.v. 2018] The mathematical foundation of
quantum mechanics Princeton
University press 2018 .
[Rayleigh-Brace-experiment] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiments_of_Rayleigh_and_Brace
[Rowe MA, et al. (February 2001)]. "Experimental violation of a Bell's Inequality
with efficient detection". Nature. 409 (6822):
791–794. Bibcode:2001Natur.409..791K. doi:10.1038/35057215. hdl:2027.42/62731. PMID 11236986.
[ Woods, L. C.] The
Thermodynamics of Fluid Systems Clarendon Press Oxford 1975.
[Sagnac effect]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagnac_effect
[Shalm, LK,
et al. (December 2015).] "Strong Loophole-Free Test
of Local Realism". Physical Review Letters. 115 (25): 250402. arXiv:1511.03189. Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115y0402S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402. PMC 5815856. PMID 26722906.
[Shroendinger
equation 1925] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation
[Sterling Allan 2021] https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Sterling_D_Allan
[Trouton-Noble experiment] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouton-Noble_experiment
