THE CURRENT BLOG (ONLINE BOOK) HAS MAINLY SPECULATIVE CHARACTER AND IS INTRODUCING ONLY VERY PARTIALLY NEW QUANTITATIVE FORMULAE OF PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. IT IS MAINLY A CHANGE OF PERCEPTION OF THE PHYSICAL REALITY AS WE KNOW IT, TO ONE THAT HAS ALSO A 2ND MICROSCOPIC LAYER BASED ON THE ANALOGUE OF THE TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES OF PROTON ELECTRON AND NEUTRON BUT ON A SMALLER SCALE AS MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES OF MICRO-PROTON MICRO-ELECTRON AND MICRO-NEUTRON (BUT ALSO MACROSCOPIC LAYER) , THAT CURRENTLY WE KNOW PARTIALLY AS FIELDS LIKE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD OR QUANTUM VACUUM. THE MAIN PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF MICRO-PROTON , MICRO-ELECTRON AND MICRO-NEUTRON IS THE FAMOUS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS, 2-SLIT ELECTRON EXPERIMENT WHERE IT IS PHOTOGRAPHED NOT ONLY THE ELECTRON THIS HITS THE PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATE BUT ALSO THE WAVE OF CHARGE BY SUCH MICRO-PARTICLES THAT THE ELECTRON MOTION CREATES. WE LEAVE OPEN THE MANY DIFFERENT WAYS THAT THE MATTER OF PROTONS/NEUTRONS/ELECTRONS CAN COUPLE WITH THE 2ND LAYER MATTER OF MICRO-PROTINS/MICRO-NEUTRONS/MICRO-ELECTRONS IN OTHER WORDS THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND THE "QUANTUM VACUUM".
THE ONLY NEW SPECULATION OF QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION IS THE APPLICATION OF THE WELL KNOWN NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS FOR THIS 2ND MICROSCOPIC FLUID LAYER IN THE ABSENCE OF COUPLING WITH THE VISIBLE MATTER (OF ELECTRONS PROTONS NEUTRONS OR PLANETS ). THEREFORE A QUANTITATIVE FORMULATION WHICH IS OF APPLICATIONS TO A RATHER MACROSCOPIC SCALE E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE. IT IS SPECULATED THOUGH HOW BY CHANGING THE PERCEPTION OF MATERIAL REALITY FROM A SINGLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCY) OF THE STANDARD ABOVE FREE AND PERMANENT TRIAD OF PARTICLES TO AT LEAST A DOUBLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCIES) PHYSICAL REALITY WITH BOTH THE STANDARD TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES BUT ALSO MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES WE COULD DO THE NEXT:
A) REFORMULATE EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION WHICH INCLUDE THOSE OF I. NEWTON AND ARE MORE EXACT AND PHYSICALLY MEANINGFUL AND REALISTIC THAN THOSE OF A. EINSTEIN.
B) REFORMULATE AND PROVE AGAIN THE SPECIAL RELATIVITY FORMULAE AS A KIND OF "LINEARIZED WAVED INERTIA" OF E.G. AN ELECTRON ON THE SUBSTRATUM 2ND LAYER PHYSICAL REALITY, BUT UNDER TOTALLY DIFFERENT AXIOMS THAT DO NOT INVOLVE THAT NOTHING GOES FASTER THAN LIGHT.
C) REFORMULATE NON-LINEAR EQUATIONS FOR THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM WHICH INVOLVE THOUGH MAGNITUDES OF GRAVITATION TOO, FOR LARGE SCALE PHENOMENA E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE PHENOMENA . THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IS ONLY THE LINEAR COUPLING OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD WHICH IS MADE FROM THE MICRO-TRIAD OF MICRO-PROTONS MICRO-NEUTRONS AND MICRO-ELECTRONS, WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS AND IS ACCEPTABLE APPROXIMATELY CORRECT AT SMALL LABORATORY SCALE.
D) AFTER THE JOIN REFORMULATION OF CLASSICAL GRAVITATION AND CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IN THE NEXT DECADES PREDICT THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES THAT MAY EXTRACT RENEWABLE SOLAR ENERGY STORED IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD (FREE ENERGY). AND THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION FLYING VEHICLES IN VARIOUS SHAPES, INCLUDING DISC-SHAPES, THAT MAY USE THE ABOVE ENERGY FOR FLYING .
E) DERIVE THE SCHRODINGER WAVE MECHANICS OR THE EQUIVALENT HEISENBERG MATRIX MECHANICS FROM A LINEAR COUPLING OF THE SUBSTRATUM LAYER NEUTRAL FLUID OF MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES (CALLED ERRONEOUSLY QUANTUM VACUUM) OR GRAVITATIONAL FIELD WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS.
IN SUMMARY MORE THAN 80% THE CONTENT OF THE CURRENT WORKS IS TO CHANGE DEEPLY AND IN A PROFOUND WAY OUR QUALITATIVE PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE PHYSICAL REALITY WHICH CAN LEAD IN THE FUTURE DECADES TO A UNIFIED QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM. IN LESS THAN 20% OF THE SPECULATIONS, THE ONLY QUANTITATIVE SET OF FORMULAE (THOSE OF NAVIER-STOKES) THAT ARE INTRODUCED ARE ONLY A PRELIMINARY STEP THAT CAN BE DONE IN RATHER EASIER WAY FOR THIS UNIFICATION, AND HAS APPLICATIONS MAINLY TO LARGER SCALE PHENOMENA E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM.
BECAUSE THE TERM AETHER IS KNOWN TO BE DISCREDITED AT LEAST FOR A WHOLE CENTURY, WE NEED TO CLARIFY ITS RELEVANCY TO THE THEORIES OF FIELDS WHICH ARE WELL ACCEPTED.
SPECIAL AND GENERAL RELATIVITY ARE NOTHING MORE THAN MODELS OF AETHER FOR INERTIAL MASS, AND FOR THE UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION. ANY MODEL OF AETHER AS CLASSICAL "FIELD" (GRAVITATIONAL OR ELECTROMAGNETIC ETC) THAT DOES NOT GET DEEPLY TO THE INDIVISIBLE FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES MATERIAL STRUCTURE OF THE FIELD ITSELF, IS INADEQUATE FOR A FULL MODEL OF AETHER AS WE SHALL SEE. THE INDIVISIBLEs OR PARTICLES OF A FIELD ARE OBVIOUSLY NONE OF THE KNOWN PARTICLES, BUT STILL THEY CAN BE AS SIMPLE AS THE KNOWN TRIADS OF PROTON, NEUTRON ELECTRON ONLY AT RADICALLY SMALLER SIZE.
OTHER CLASSICAL MODELS OF AETHER ARE 1) THE MAXWELL'S ELECTROMAGMETIC FIELD (OR ELECTROMAGNETIZED AETHER AS MAXWELL WAS CALLING IT) 2) THE QUANTUM VACUUM THAT AS SUBSTRATUM GIVES RANDOMNESS TO MOTIONS OF PROTONS, NEUTRONS, ELECTRONS THROUGH THE SCHRODINGER WAVE EQUATION (DIRAC'S AETHER)
Electromagetised
aether-field acting on matter
Lorenz force equation.
Matter acting on the
Electromagetised aether-field
Static
1) The
Coulomb law (Es static electric field)or in general the 1st of the maxwell scalar potential equations
where a0 is the algebraic (signed) density of the charged aether )
Dynamic
2) The Biot-Savard law of creation of the
magnetic field by a moving charge (current).
3) Moving charges (current) creates in a dynamic
way vector electromagnetic potential and electric field (Ed) , which CANNOT be
derived from the Coulobs law after superimposing the motion
Or simply
where A is the vector of the momentum of the charged aether, and J is the momentum of a charge.
The Maxwell equations on the scalar and vector potential (pressure and momentum density of charged aether) that are the Linear DAlambertian forced wave equations. Such equation are linear, and represent the aether drag by chargef matter, for relatively uniform not chaotic non-linear motion of matter, that also create rather smooth electromagnetization and motion in aether
Or simply
where A is the vector of the momentum of the charged aether, and J is the momentum of a charge.
The Maxwell equations on the scalar and vector potential (pressure and momentum density of charged aether) that are the Linear DAlambertian forced wave equations. Such equation are linear, and represent the aether drag by chargef matter, for relatively uniform not chaotic non-linear motion of matter, that also create rather smooth electromagnetization and motion in aether
The Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition of any velocity field (see e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_decomposition ), will give that the aether velocity field can be decomposed in to a part with scalar velocity potential (potential or non-rotational flow) , and a vector velocity potential (divergence free or solenoidal or in-compressible flow).
If the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition is applied to the vector field of the forces due to the electomagetised aether, it is the guidline of the decomposed description of the electromagetism to Electric and magnetic field or scalar and vector potential
The first part with the Landau derivation will derive the forced wave of the scalar electromagnetic potential potential, while the second part will derive the forced wave equation of the vector electromagnetic potential. Both are nevertheless linearizations of the non-Linear Navier-Stokes equations of velocities (ad pressures)
As we shall see later, after the basic charged aether parameters interpretation of the vector and scalar electromagnetic potential,
We may notice that both above equations are the equations of forced waves (the D' Alembert's wave equation) The first forced wave of charged aether pressures, from the spin of a static charged (free permanent) elementary material particle (proton or electron) , and the second, the forced wave on the charged aethers velocities (or vector momentum density) from the spin of moving material elementary particles (like electron, proton) .
In short the linear electromagnetism (Maxwell's electromagnetism) simply formulates, that the static or moving (free permanent ) elementary particles create waves due to heir intrinsic spin frequency.
This is the basic linearized interaction of changed matter and charged aether. Of course the foul interaction is non-linear.
Neutral
aether-field acting on matter
The extension to (weak) Lorenz-like
force to include a) Neutral aether temperature gradient (Newtonian gravitostatics, and aether heat gravitistatics) b) neutral aether acceleration c) Neutral aether
magnetism .
Of course under normal conditions and body sizes the latter two terms are very weak compared to the static part
Of course under normal conditions and body sizes the latter two terms are very weak compared to the static part
Matter
acting on neutral aether-field
Static
a) Newton's matter density , gravitostatics
Aether temperature gradient gravitostatics
Linear inertia equation
This equation simple states that any particle (e.g. a neutron) because of its spin, it creates a scalar compression wave ("sound" ) in the neutral aether (here a0 is the density of the neutral aether) which propagates at the speed of light c. Notice that in acoustics the above equation is nothing else that a forced sound wave, if it was to be interpreted in air rather than aether. This equation is mainly microscopic, in other words for particles at a classical laboratory
Linear inertia equation
This equation simple states that any particle (e.g. a neutron) because of its spin, it creates a scalar compression wave ("sound" ) in the neutral aether (here a0 is the density of the neutral aether) which propagates at the speed of light c. Notice that in acoustics the above equation is nothing else that a forced sound wave, if it was to be interpreted in air rather than aether. This equation is mainly microscopic, in other words for particles at a classical laboratory
Dynamic
b) Constant linear velocity moving matter
creates aether linear velocity and neutral aether magetism. Of course largely weaker. The
quantitative details of this law cannot be derived neither from the static Newtonian
gravitation, neither from Einsteinian gravitation.
This equation for this interaction of aether and matter is mainly macroscopic, in other words for celestal bodies like planets, stars and is strong and measurable as the celestial body is electromagnetised (e.g. magnetic field of a planet, is synonymous to the magnetized aether following the motion of the planet etc )
We may simply state the Maxwell-like equations on the scalar and vector potential (pressure and momentum density of charged aether) that are the Linear DAlembertian forced wave equations. But in this case as equation describing the effect of neutral particles like neutron, on the neutral aether. The effect is of course much more week than that of chatged particles (electromagnetism) that electromagetise (charge) aether too. Such equation would be laboratory scale valid and not say macroscopic planetary scale, of moving planets in aether.
This equation for this interaction of aether and matter is mainly macroscopic, in other words for celestal bodies like planets, stars and is strong and measurable as the celestial body is electromagnetised (e.g. magnetic field of a planet, is synonymous to the magnetized aether following the motion of the planet etc )
We may simply state the Maxwell-like equations on the scalar and vector potential (pressure and momentum density of charged aether) that are the Linear DAlembertian forced wave equations. But in this case as equation describing the effect of neutral particles like neutron, on the neutral aether. The effect is of course much more week than that of chatged particles (electromagnetism) that electromagetise (charge) aether too. Such equation would be laboratory scale valid and not say macroscopic planetary scale, of moving planets in aether.
The motion of the particles with spin is constrained by the field-gas (aether) so that at every state of the motion is created a wave of velocities on aether due to the spin of the particle and the next equation holds of the interaction of the moving particle with spin and the aether,
(2.0.1)
where A is the vector of the momentum of the (neutral) aether, and j is the momentum of the moving particle. Notice again that this equation is identical with the Maxwell equation of the vector electromagnetic potential , except that in the Maxwell equations the momentum J is of charges.
This equation is mainly microscopic, in other words for particles at a classical laboratory
This equation is mainly microscopic, in other words for particles at a classical laboratory
The role in the aether-matter interaction of the
frequency of the spin of protons/neutrons/electrons of matter.
Higher frequency creates larger correlation of matter and aether-field motion.
Higher frequency creates larger correlation of matter and aether-field motion.
The role of the level of human consciousness
to the frequency of the spin of protons/neutrons/electrons in the human
body.
Where classical laboratoty electromagnetism is wrong
1) Moving charges (current) create in a dynamic way vector electromagnetic potential and electric field, which CANNOT be derived from the Coulobs law after superimposing the motion.In particular accelerating charge is producing electric field which cannot be derived simply from the Maxwell equations by the changing magnetic field of the moving charge.
2) For fast moving (e.g. rotating) magnets, the magnetic field seazes to be conservative!
Rarely in fluid dynamics the field of rotations (curl) of a fluid is conservative! The fact that for static magnets is at a very good aproximation conservative does not mean that in general and at all possible states, that the magetic field is always conservative.
3)Because of the nature of magnetism which is the curl or rot of the velocity of the charged (and not neutral) aether, at the end of a magnetic field is obligatory that will exist very week at least electric field too (when charged aether becomes again neutral) In other words the idea of a purely magnetic field is is so ideal that it does not exist in reality.
1) Moving charges (current) create in a dynamic way vector electromagnetic potential and electric field, which CANNOT be derived from the Coulobs law after superimposing the motion.In particular accelerating charge is producing electric field which cannot be derived simply from the Maxwell equations by the changing magnetic field of the moving charge.
2) For fast moving (e.g. rotating) magnets, the magnetic field seazes to be conservative!
Rarely in fluid dynamics the field of rotations (curl) of a fluid is conservative! The fact that for static magnets is at a very good aproximation conservative does not mean that in general and at all possible states, that the magetic field is always conservative.
3)Because of the nature of magnetism which is the curl or rot of the velocity of the charged (and not neutral) aether, at the end of a magnetic field is obligatory that will exist very week at least electric field too (when charged aether becomes again neutral) In other words the idea of a purely magnetic field is is so ideal that it does not exist in reality.
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.