THE ONLY NEW SPECULATION OF QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION IS THE APPLICATION OF THE WELL KNOWN NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS FOR THIS 2ND MICROSCOPIC FLUID LAYER IN THE ABSENCE OF COUPLING WITH THE VISIBLE MATTER (OF ELECTRONS PROTONS NEUTRONS OR PLANETS ). THEREFORE A QUANTITATIVE FORMULATION WHICH IS OF APPLICATIONS TO A RATHER MACROSCOPIC SCALE E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE.
THIS WORK DOES THE BEST ONE CAN DO TO DISCOVER THE TRUTH BEHIND THE STANDARD EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM AS FAR AS A 2ND MATERIAL LAYER UNIFICATION IS INTENDED, WHEN NO LABORATORIES EXPERIMENTS AND LARGE GROUPS OF SCIENTISTS WITH WELL FUNDED RESEARCH IS POSSIBLE. THE MAIN 3 CONTRIBUTIONS ARE
1) THE REVEALING OF THE TRUE MEANING OF THE POISSON EQUATION OF NEWTON'S SPHERICAL GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL IN RELATION TO THE POISSON EQUATION OF SPHERICAL HEAT PROPAGATION IS THE KEY SHIFT IN THE CORRECT PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF GRAVITATION WHICH ALLOWS FOR DISCOVERING SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY STORED IN IT.
2) THE REVEALING INTERPRETATION OF MAXWELL'S ELECTROMAGNETIC MAGITUTES IN RELATION TO AN IONIZED OR CHANGED 2ND MATERIAL LAYER SUBSTRATUM AND
3) THE PRELIMINARY UNIFYING ROLE OF NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS OF THE SUBSTRATUM MATERIAL FLUID FOR GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF NEW ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION FOR TRANSPORTATIONS.
IT IS ALSO SPECULATED HOW BY CHANGING THE PERCEPTION OF MATERIAL REALITY FROM A SINGLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCY) OF THE STANDARD ABOVE FREE AND PERMANENT TRIAD OF PARTICLES TO AT LEAST A DOUBLE LAYER (OR FREQUENCIES) PHYSICAL REALITY WITH BOTH THE STANDARD TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES BUT ALSO MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES WE COULD DO THE NEXT:
A) REFORMULATE EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION WHICH INCLUDE THOSE OF I. NEWTON AND ARE MORE EXACT AND PHYSICALLY MEANINGFUL AND REALISTIC THAN THOSE OF A. EINSTEIN.
B) REFORMULATE AND PROVE AGAIN THE SPECIAL RELATIVITY FORMULAE AS A KIND OF "LINEARIZED WAVED INERTIA" OF E.G. AN ELECTRON ON THE SUBSTRATUM 2ND LAYER PHYSICAL REALITY, BUT UNDER TOTALLY DIFFERENT AXIOMS THAT DO NOT INVOLVE THAT NOTHING GOES FASTER THAN LIGHT.
C) REFORMULATE NON-LINEAR EQUATIONS FOR THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM WHICH INVOLVE THOUGH MAGNITUDES OF GRAVITATION TOO, FOR LARGE SCALE PHENOMENA E.G. SOLAR SYSTEM SCALE PHENOMENA . THE CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IS ONLY THE LINEAR COUPLING OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD WHICH IS MADE FROM THE MICRO-TRIAD OF MICRO-PROTONS MICRO-NEUTRONS AND MICRO-ELECTRONS, WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS AND IS ACCEPTABLE APPROXIMATELY CORRECT AT SMALL LABORATORY SCALE.
D) AFTER THE JOIN REFORMULATION OF CLASSICAL GRAVITATION AND CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETISM IN THE NEXT DECADES PREDICT THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES THAT MAY EXTRACT RENEWABLE SOLAR ENERGY STORED IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD (FREE ENERGY). AND THE EXISTENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION FLYING VEHICLES IN VARIOUS SHAPES, INCLUDING DISC-SHAPES, THAT MAY USE THE ABOVE ENERGY FOR FLYING .
E) DERIVE THE SCHRODINGER WAVE MECHANICS OR THE EQUIVALENT HEISENBERG MATRIX MECHANICS FROM A LINEAR COUPLING OF THE SUBSTRATUM LAYER NEUTRAL FLUID OF MICRO-TRIAD OF FREE AND PERMANENT PARTICLES (CALLED ERRONEOUSLY QUANTUM VACUUM) OR GRAVITATIONAL FIELD WITH THE MATTER OF ELECTRONS/PROTONS/NEUTRONS.
We write here the energy conservation for a small conical electro- magnetised aether whirl or tornado, where aether heat is extracted (aether temperature proportional to the scalar gravitostatic potential φ ) and converted to aether charge acceleration (E electric field) and aether charge rotation B or magnetic field.
Such equations CANNOT BE DERIVED FROM THE MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS AND THE CLASSICAL EQUATIONS OF GRAVITATION (NEWTON'S OR EINSTEIN'S).
The relevant form, of Navier-Stokes equations, of Newtonian, isotropic, compressible fluids is
Compressible flow of Newtonian fluids
There are some phenomena that are closely linked with fluid compressibility. One of the obvious examples is compression waves (sound in air and aether-sound in aether). Description of such phenomena requires more general presentation of the Navier–Stokes equation that takes into account fluid compressibility. If viscosity is assumed a constant, one additional term appears, as shown here:[1][2]
where is the second viscosity.
These
equations are the standard for a whirl from fluid dynamics from the Navier-Stokes equations, that all academic physicists
know, so there is no mystery at all. The key to correspond known magnitudes
from electromagnetism and gravitation to the fluid dynamic magnitudes are as in
the published paper of the Lancaster lecture, or as in post 1.
We should involve also the equation
-
- Where:
- = Pressure
- = Temperature
- = Gas constant for the specific gas
ρ is the density
The involved field magnitudes are:
The involved field magnitudes are:
φ gravitostatic
scalar potential
Α
Vector electromagnetic potential
a
Scalar electromagnetic potential
Macroscopic
geometric parameters of the whirl
E electric
field
B
magnetic field.
New
electromagnetic and gravitational constants in the equations.
Derived magnitudes
Extracted
power as energy per time unit.
These equations is conjectured to apply to most of the free-energy electromagnetic devices.
We present here a very well known solution to the Navier-Stokes equations of Newtonian-isotropic compressible fluids, of a whirl (small tornado) motion. This can be a solution both to neutral aether (a form of dynamic gravity) or to the electromagnetised aether (a more correct form of the electromagnetic field e.g. of Rodin's coil).
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier_Stokes
BUT we must point out that these equations maybe for example the whirl of Rodin coil, but it is not what we really want for a general whirl that produces free-energy. And the reason is that the equation below are of a symmetric whirl, and non-isothermic where no extraction of heat is made from the fluid. Instead the temperature of the fluid increases due to friction. What we really need is a modification of the equations below, so that heat is extracted from the fluid and converted to extra kinetic energy of the fluid (much like equations of atmospheric tornados).
In other words the flow is not isothermal, or isentropic or barotropic.
A three-dimensional steady-state vortex solution
A nice steady-state example with no singularities comes from considering the flow along the lines of a Hopf fibration. Let r be a constant radius to the inner coil. One set of solutions is given by:
for arbitrary constants A and B. This is a solution in a non-viscous gas (compressible fluid) whose density, velocities and pressure goes to zero far from the origin. (Note this is not a solution to the Clay Millennium problem because that refers to incompressible fluids where is a constant, neither does it deal with the uniqueness of the Navier–Stokes equations with respect to any turbulence properties.) It is also worth pointing out that the components of the velocity vector are exactly those from the Pythagorean quadruple parametrization. Other choices of density and pressure are possible with the same velocity field:
See also a relevant video (which applies is to the aggregate of galaxies and stars rather that to the local aether field).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKtevjrZOGs
The next work describes a vortex motion of tornados that do extract thermal energy from the atmospheric fluid, and thus closer to the case of the (aether) field vortex motions in free energy.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19700032427.pdf
Also here are classical models of the tornadoes vortex motion.
The Rankine model, the Burgers-Rott vortex model, and the Sullivan vortex model
http://www.kilty.com/pdfs/models.pdf
Note however that tornados models that the density is constant (incompressible flow) would not be of much interest, as we are interested for thermal energy extraction by decompression.
See also the thesis of JIANJUN XIA
http://wvuscholar.wvu.edu:8881//exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS82MDc0.pdf
HEAT EXTRACTION VORTEX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKtevjrZOGs
The next work describes a vortex motion of tornados that do extract thermal energy from the atmospheric fluid, and thus closer to the case of the (aether) field vortex motions in free energy.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19700032427.pdf
Also here are classical models of the tornadoes vortex motion.
The Rankine model, the Burgers-Rott vortex model, and the Sullivan vortex model
http://www.kilty.com/pdfs/models.pdf
Note however that tornados models that the density is constant (incompressible flow) would not be of much interest, as we are interested for thermal energy extraction by decompression.
See also the thesis of JIANJUN XIA
http://wvuscholar.wvu.edu:8881//exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS82MDc0.pdf
HEAT EXTRACTION VORTEX
As far as I know there have not been formulated in simple equations a steady curve-linear conical-like vortex motion of a compressible fluid (e.g. air) with temperature gradient along the curve-linear conical axis, where there is detonation or pressure decrease, from the narrow diameter of the curve-linear cone to its wide diameter , at the cost of heat of the fluid, which sustains the vortex motion. (Heat-extraction vortex). But if such a formulation would ever be given then this would be a quantitative mathematical model for "free-energy" devices. Of course in the case of aether, this "free-energy" would be nothing else than the aether heat which is synonymous to the gravitational potential energy, which surprisingly for the perceptions of classical Newtonian gravitostatics is mainly not heat from matter, but heat from the infrared solar radiation stored in the aether gravitational field as gravitational potential energy. (See posts 2.7, 2.8)
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.